Fresh out of Barnard College with a degree in political science, Riley is a writer and reporter for GZERO. When she isn’t writing about global politics, you can find her making GZERO’s crossword puzzles, conducting research on American politics, or persisting in her lifelong quest to learn French. Riley spends her time outside of work grilling, dancing, and wearing many hats (both literally and figuratively).
On Monday, I received a text message that I assumed was spam. Today, I realized it was a very real survey from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission asking me if I was Jewish – and that it was sent to everyone on Barnard College’s payroll.
Background: Barnard College, a women’s college affiliated with Columbia University where I am a teacher’s assistant, has been under investigation by the EEOC for antisemitism amid frequent protests on campus over the last year. The faculty was not informed that their personal phone numbers had been sent to the government, but the school maintains that the EEOC was “legally entitled to obtain the contact information of Barnard’s employees” to conduct its investigation.
The Microsoft Form – which anyone can fill out if they have the link – first asks faculty whether they are Jewish or Israeli, their department, and their superiors’ names. It then asks whether they have experienced anything in a list of antisemitic events, ranging from “unwelcome comments, jokes, or discussions” and “harassment, intimidation, aggressive actions” to “antisemitic or anti-Israeli protests.”
Incidents of antisemitism have been documented since protests broke out on Columbia’s campus last year. But, so far, the government’s investigations into whether the administration was doing enough to prevent and punish antisemitic behavior was limited to the experiences of students.
Now, with the focus turning to professors, many faculty members are concerned the Trump administration is weaponizing the EEOC to infringe on college campuses. The survey comes as the Trump administration is citing allegations of unchecked antisemitism as justification for threatening to withhold federal funding unless it is granted the authority to conduct “audits” of academic programs and departments, and impose changes to the university’s governance structure and hiring practices.
These are unlikely to be the last texts. In March, the Department of Education sent letters to 60 universities informing them that they were under investigation for antisemitism. From the protests to the funding freezes, a pattern has presented itself in the upheavals on college campuses over the last year: They may begin at Columbia, but they don’t end there.
