Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
News
Demonstrators with US and Ukrainian flags rally near the U.S. Capitol ahead of President Donald Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress in Washington, D.C., USA, on March 4, 2025.
Earlier this week, the US cut shipments of a number of weapons to Ukraine, including Patriot interceptor missiles, a critical part of Kyiv’s air defenses. Here’s a short guide to making sense of why that happened, and how it could affect the course of the Russia-Ukraine war.
What is a Patriot interceptor? It’s one of the world’s most advanced air defenses, able to shoot ballistic missiles out of the sky. The US-made system is sold to nearly 20 countries, and was first given to Ukraine in early 2023. The Patriot’s main theaters of action are Ukraine as well as in the Middle East, where it has protected US forces and Israel from ballistic missiles launched by Iran or Iran-aligned groups.
Why did the US stop sending them to Ukraine? Low stockpiles, evidently. Nearly two years of intense use in both Ukraine and the Middle East have crushed supplies of Patriot missiles, of which only about 500 are made annually, and drawn resources away from other critical weapons systems as well.
After the Trump administration bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities ten days ago, for example, American forces fired the largest salvo of Patriots “in history” to repel Tehran’s (well-telegraphed) retaliatory airstrikes on the US base in Qatar. That may have pushed supplies below critical levels, raising concerns about broader US weapons production capacity.
Still, this is a message to Ukraine, right? Even if concern about scarcity was the primary motivation, US President Donald Trump – who won the election in part on promises to cut aid for Ukraine and force both sides into a “deal” – has clearly hit Kyiv with the short end of the stick here.
It’s worth noting that the decision to cut the shipments to Ukraine reportedly came from Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, a prominent China hawk who sees support for Ukraine as a distraction from challenging Beijing.
And that’s not the only China connection in this story. Amid a growing trade and technology war with Washington, Beijing recently banned the US-bound export of certain minerals that are essential in weapons manufacturing. Among them were gallium, antimony, and germanium, critical components of various weapons and ammunition systems, including the Patriot.
“To me, this is the most interesting untold story,” says Eurasia Group research director Marc Gustafson, a former national security intelligence chief, “mostly because the Pentagon cannot talk about it. China’s bans have been crushing for the US defense industry, particularly regarding the weapons the US has been providing to Ukraine and Israel.”
How badly will this decision hurt Ukraine? Kyiv called the announcement a “total shock.” At a moment when Russia has been launching its most ferocious – and increasingly indiscriminate – aerial assaults of the entire war, losing the Patriots will leave Ukraine’s cities and civilians vastly more exposed to the Kremlin’s missiles and drones.
But the move will have less effect on Kyiv’s primary goal of simply holding off Russia at the front lines, says Alex Brideau, Eurasia Group’s top Ukraine and Russia expert. “It’s not a back breaker,” he says. Still, if the Trump administration cuts to conventional ammunition last for any length of time, Ukraine could be in more serious trouble fast.
Survivors of the KMP Tunu Pratama Jaya ferry sinking wait to be identified by officers at Gilimanuk port, after the ferry carrying 65 people sank near the Indonesian island of Bali, in Bali, Indonesia, July 3, 2025.
65: A ferry carrying 65 people sank near the island of Bali, Indonesia, late on Wednesday. Six people have died as a result, and authorities have now ceased the search for another 30 passengers. The remaining 29 have been rescued. Ferries are a major mode of transport in the Indonesian archipelago, but safety standards are notoriously lax.
25: The South American trading bloc Mercosur will meet this weekend to discuss something that has been under discussion for 25 years: a trade deal with the European Union. The two blocs reached a deal in principle last year, but the EU has yet to ratify it due to opposition from France – specifically, French farmers. Mercosur did seal a separate deal, though, with a group of four non-EU European countries.
28: In an awful shock to soccer fans around the world, Liverpool striker Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva – also a professional footballer – died in a car accident early Thursday morning in western Spain. The Portuguese star Jota, who won every major trophy in England, was just 28 years old.
30,000: Europeans may not celebrate Fourth of July, but 30,000 of them are still having their travel plans disrupted this weekend after low cost carrier Ryanair canceled 170 flights due to an air-traffic control strike in France.What We're Watching: House folds on Trump bill, Beijing lashes out at US-Vietnam deal, Nigerian opposition unites
U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson walks back to office, as Republican lawmakers struggle to pass U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 3, 2025.
House holdouts bluff then fold on Trump’s budget bill
The US House is set to pass President Donald Trump’s epic tax-and-spending bill any minute now. Some eleventh hour House Republicans holdouts had signaled that they would oppose the broadly unpopular bill because it boosts the national debt by trillions while threatening to leave millions without health insurance, but they quickly fell in line after under direct pressure from Trump. The imminent final passage of the bill will fulfil Trump’s wish to have the landmark legislation on his desk by the Fourth of July holiday.
US-Vietnam trade deal angers Beijing
The US and Vietnam struck a preliminary trade deal to lower their bilateral tariffs yesterday, and China is not happy about it. Why? Because as part of the deal the US will heavily tariff any goods that pass through Vietnam from another country en-route to the US. That’s a direct swipe at Beijing, which does this frequently to skirt high US tariffs. China’s commerce ministry said it “firmly opposes any party striking a deal at the expense of Chinese interests” and threatened “countermeasures.”
Nigeria sees huge political shakeup as opposition leaders join forces
In one of the biggest shake ups since the end of military rule in 1999, Nigeria’s two main opposition leaders – Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi – have joined forces to try to oust President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 election. In the 2023 election, they won a combined 54% of the vote compared to Tinubu’s 37%, meaning a common front could win. The big question: Which of these two political heavyweights will agree to play second fiddle to the other when it comes time to pick a presidential candidate?Zohran Mamdani was a long shot. But the 33-year-old democratic socialist state assemblyman flew past former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s name recognition and money advantage to win the Democratic primary for New York mayor last week.
On paper, the upset may seem like a parochial story of quirky turnout math and a uniquely flawed opponent in a city so blue it’d elect a Smurf. In reality, Mamdani’s victory is a canary in the coal mine, less for what it says about him and New York politics than the conditions that made his message land. Dismissing it as an intramural oddity misses the broader point: when voters believe the deck is stacked against them, they look for candidates who promise to reshuffle it.
First, a reality check: There’s no guarantee Mamdani will win in November. Only registered Democrats vote in primaries, and the general electorate is a different animal. Moreover, while New York is reliably blue, big outside money is lining up against him, so it remains plausible (even if not super likely) that he could lose to an independent candidate.
Nobody knows how Mamdani would govern if he wins, either. He could push the policies he ran on, some of which could create a crisis if enacted. In the worst-case scenario, they could result in capital flight, plummeting tax revenue, worsened public services, rising crime, and a host of other ills that would make the greatest city in the world slightly less great. (Though none of that would make me consider relocating my home and company HQ. Moose is up for anything.)
But Mamdani will also be a first-time executive constrained by Albany’s veto power and the tough realities and tradeoffs of city management. I wouldn’t be shocked if he governed more pragmatically than he campaigned. He’s already ditched some of his more controversial positions such as “defund the police,” and he’s shown a willingness to engage and evolve. He’s clearly a skilled and ambitious politician who wants to have a successful career in this business; to achieve this, he needs to be popular and win elections, and that means being seen as having done a decent job as mayor. If he does things that make New York’s tax base flee the city, crime go up, and public services fall apart, he will be seen as a failure. As Fiorello LaGuardia said, “There is no Democratic or Republican way to pick up garbage.”
Ultimately, though, how and what Mamdani does in the future is almost beside the point. Nothing will change the fact that he won the primary with an unabashedly far-left, economically populist, soak-the-rich message in the beating heart of global capitalism. New York is simultaneously one of the wealthiest and least affordable cities in America (and the world). Mamdani’s campaign was focused on slashing the cost of living and improving the quality of life for regular New Yorkers, promising a $30 minimum wage, free buses and childcare, city-owned grocery stores to slash food prices, rent controls on stabilized apartments, and higher taxes on the rich and corporations to pay for it all.
In the America I grew up in, this kind of platform would’ve been DOA, and Mamdani would’ve long been ostracized from polite society. The only political label that’s historically been more toxic than “socialist” is “communist.” Everyone knows that’s about as un-American as it gets, which is why Donald Trump calls anyone to his left a communist, from Mamdani to Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.
But here’s the thing: the slurs only carry weight if people still see the United States as capitalist. Increasingly, they don’t. The United States looks less like a free‑market meritocracy – the kind with equal opportunity, open competition, rags-to-riches possibility – and more like a pay‑to‑play kleptocracy where access and advantage are auctioned to the highest bidder.
When Mamdani said that “billionaires shouldn’t exist,” he wasn’t threatening to line them up at dawn, but rather just to tax them down to size – at least as long as the playing field looks as tilted as it presently does in the United States. A growing number of Americans, those for whom the American Dream is the stuff of history books and “socialism” gives more Sweden vibes than Cuba, are on board for that.
Socialists may still not be able to beat capitalists, but if voters conclude that America has devolved into a two-tier system that rewards proximity to power more than hard work, don’t be surprised when a Ugandan-born millennial socialist like Mamdani has a shot against oligarchs and kleptocrats.
This country’s last successful populist wave started with a Queens real-estate showman promising to blow up business as usual. Trump won the White House twice on the back of voters who believed that democracy was broken and the game had been rigged against average Americans by coastal elites and the “deep state.” He’s spent a decade blaming global trade and immigration for working‑class pain, to reasonable success. But when it comes to “draining the swamp,” Trump has done anything but. Instead, he has expanded the swamp – and I’m not just talking about the new Alligator Alcatraz he's so excited about. Now Republicans in Congress are ramming through the One Big Beautiful Bill, which is set to be the largest wealth transfer from the poor to the rich in modern US history and will burden future generations with trillions in additional debt. Talk about class warfare.
If you’re 25, saddled with student loans, priced out of housing, and watching Trump cut the social safety net you’re paying into to fund tax cuts for his billionaire friends and cronies, soaking the rich increasingly looks not just like common sense but like self-defense. It’s no wonder Mamdani’s message resonated.
And I suspect the demand for what he’s selling will only grow in the coming years. Advances in artificial intelligence threaten massive job losses among white-collar workers. The backlash this time around will be driven not by blue-collar, working-class men in the Rust Belt but by priced-out urban professionals with advanced degrees and politically active suburban moms whose over-educated, under-employed children won’t have the opportunities they thought they would. Trump’s protectionist, anti-immigrant crusade won’t win over that crowd. Establishment Democrats haven’t come up with a good answer yet, either.
This doesn’t necessarily mean Mamdani himself is about to become the left’s new Trump. The fact is Mamdani is everything Trump wished Obama could’ve been: actually born in Africa, actually a Muslim, and actually a (democratic) socialist. That may be a winning combo in Brooklyn coffee shops and parts of the Bronx; color me skeptical it plays out as well in swing districts across the country. But the policy lane Mamdani has staked out – call it “anti-kleptocratic economic populism” – is wide open for someone with more national appeal to speed through it.
CEOs should worry less about Mamdani and more about the energy he’s tapping into. Those who mistake lobbying spend for sound strategy will one day wake to find themselves the targets of bipartisan populist pitchforks. If companies don’t start embracing genuinely open competition and mainstream politics remain unable to fix the optics of a rigged game, voters will send outsiders to rewrite the rules for them.
What We’re Watching: Dalai Lama’s succession plans, Big Beautiful Bill in the House, Israel-Hamas ceasefire under review
The Dalai Lama at the start of his 90th birthday celebrations in his exile in northern India.
Who will be the next Dalai Lama?
As the Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday, he is meeting with top Buddhist figures this week to lay out succession plans that could draw a sharp response from China. The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, fled his native Tibet after a failed uprising against Chinese rule in 1959 and became the global face of a campaign for Tibetan independence. While China wants to install a successor who will accept Beijing’s control of both Tibet and Taiwan, the Dalai Lama’s latest statement emphasized his office’s “sole authority” over the selection process.
Is the US House ready to pass Trump’s signature legislation?
Following Senate passage on Wednesday, President Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” has returned to the House where lawmakers are scrambling to reach the floor for a possible vote later today. If all members of the House are present — following a cancelled recess, storms in the Washington area this morning have made travel to the Capitol challenging — Republicans can afford just three “no” votes from their members. Some House Republicans already say they would vote against the bill in its current form, likely delaying eventual passage until after Trump’s July 4 deadline.
Israel and Hamas are not yet committed to Gaza ceasefire
On Tuesday, Trump posted on his Truth Social account that Israel had “agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE” in Gaza and warned Hamas that its leaders had better say yes. As of late this morning, both Israel and Hamas remain publicly uncommitted to Trump’s terms. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to visit the White House next week.Hard Numbers: Russia and Azerbaijan tensions rise, Americans hit the road in record numbers, & More
People followed by mourners carry the coffins of Azerbaijani brothers Huseyn and Ziyaddin Safarov, who died in Russian police custody, to a cemetery in Hacibedelli, Azerbaijan, on July 1, 2025, in this still image from video.
2: Russia-Azerbaijan ties are fraying after the South Caucasus country said two Azeri brothers died last week after being tortured in Russian police custody. In retaliation, Azerbaijan has arrested half a dozen Russian state journalists working in the capital, Baku. The two former-Soviet countries generally get along but have had frictions over Azeri migrant labor in Russia, an Azerbaijan Airlines plane that was shot down over Russian airspace, and Moscow’s backing for Armenia in that country’s decades long conflict with Azerbaijan. The Kremlin said Azerbaijan was being “extremely emotional.”
87.1%: In the latest blow to free movement in Europe, Poland has introduced checks along its borders with Germany and Lithuania, partly a response to the surging number of people seeking first-time asylum in the country – the amount increased 87.1% from 2023 to 2024, more than any other country in Europe. The move is also a tit-for-tat measure, after Berlin introduced its own checks at the Polish-German frontier.
500: The war is going from bad to worse for Ukraine: After Russia launched over 500 drones and other missiles into its cities over the weekend, the United States halted a weapons shipment that was headed to Ukraine. The White House said it was putting its own interests first after lending military support to other countries.
14: With international demand for customer service centers soaring, is Africa ready to answer the call? Experts think so, predicting that the “Business-Process Outsourcing” industry will grow 14% annually on the continent in the coming years, nearly twice the global average. Anglophone African countries are particularly well positioned – the industry is growing nearly 20% per year in Kenya.
72.2 Million: A record 72.2 million Americans are set to travel domestically during the upcoming Fourth of July holiday weekend, according to the AAA, a nationwide motorists’ group. More than 60 million of them will be taking trips by car, driven – as it were – by the lowest summer gas prices since 2021 (and some fight delays).
US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One after departing early from the the G7 summit in Canada to return to Washington, D.C., on June 17, 2025.
When US President Donald Trump announced a swath of tariffs on virtually every US trading partner on April 2 – which he dubbed “Liberation Day” – most economists had the same warning: prices will rise. What’s more, Trump’s plan to deport millions of undocumented migrants and his adviser’s idea to weaken the US dollar would add to the buoyant pressure on prices.
Exactly three months on, those inflation distress calls appear to have been misplaced: the inflation rate was 2.4% in May, within touching distance of the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, and far below the rates seen in 2022 under former President Joe Biden – even with the dollar having its worst start to a year in over 50 years.
So why haven’t prices skyrocketed, as some economists warned?
First of all, not all the tariffs have even been imposed. When US treasury markets began to suffer following the announcement of “retaliatory tariffs,” Trump pulled back, pausing these extra taxes until July 9. What’s left of his new tariff policies are a 10% across-the-board levy – even these were briefly invalidated – a 55% rate on Chinese imports (down from 145%), and sectoral duties on goods like steel, aluminum, and auto parts. The US president has also allowed for a smattering of exemptions, most notably on smartphones and computers – those must have been a rotten Apple.
Secondly, businesses have made choices that have put a cap on price hikes.
Part of this is simply due to firms waiting for Trump to finalize his tariffs plans before they start passing on the higher costs to consumers, per University of Missouri economics professor Joseph Haslag.
“During the heyday of the negotiations, I don’t think anyone wanted to start raising prices until they knew what the final deal was going to look like,” he said.
Some of it is also thanks to forward planning. When Trump initially announced the tariffs, some firms stocked up on inputs before the duties came into effect. This has allowed them to hold prices as they continue to sell inventory that was purchased at pre-Liberation Day prices.
Finally, there are some economic factors that are putting downward pressure on prices, per Haslag. The economy is slowing, reducing demand and lowering inflation rates. What’s more, artificial intelligence may have already started helping firms to lower prices: it boosts worker and business productivity, allowing them to produce more in less time and at less cost.
Trump feels validated. The president will see the misguided warnings of high inflation as the latest example of the media and the “deep state” trying, and failing, to take him down – he lauded the low inflation rates during a May speech in Saudi Arabia. As such, he will feel that he has the green light to continue advancing other elements of his agenda, safe in the belief that any cautions from the “establishment” can be shot down as “fake news.”
Aren’t those “reciprocal tariffs” coming back though? Affirmative – they return just one week from now, and Trump’s plans are still up in the air. He has only negotiated one trade deal – with the United Kingdom – despite saying soon after “Liberation Day” that he had made 200. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hinted that there might be some flexibility on the timing, which would be in line with the president’s past actions.
“July 9 is not a drop-dead date on which tariffs are going to be implemented across the board,” said Haslag. “We’ve had other sorts of deadlines that have come and passed over the past few months with regards to tariffs.”
The chickens always come home to roost. For any political gains Trump may have made thanks to lower-than-expected inflation rates, this upcoming deadline for the reciprocals creates a major dilemma for Trump: either he “chickens out” again, as one columnist jokingly suggested, or he actually imposes these hefty duties. The Fourth of July celebrations this weekend may not be as expensive as once feared – will Americans be able to say the same for Labor Day, Thanksgiving, or even Christmas?