Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
President Donald Trump meets with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron.
What We’re Watching: US-EU nail down the details of trade deal, IAEA sounds the alarm on Iran, China challenges Dalai Lama
US, EU publishes fine print of the trade deal
More details have emerged on the terms of the trade deal between the United States and European Union, which was first announced last month. European pharmaceuticals will now face a 15% tariff – US President Donald Trump had threatened a rate of “25% or higher.” There will also be 15% duties on EU automobiles, down from 27.5%, provided Brussels passes legislation to reduce its own 10% duties on car imports. The US could also cut rates on metals, up to a certain quota. In return, the EU pledged to invest heavily in American energy and AI chips, and to grant preferential market access for several US agricultural products. In a blow to wine aficionados, the EU wasn’t able to nab lower rates for its alcohol products. Quel cauchemar!
IAEA in the dark on Iran’s uranium
International Atomic Energy Agency officials head to Washington next week amid mounting concern over Iran’s unmonitored stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium. Inspectors have been shut out since June’s US & Israeli strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, leaving the agency unable to verify the fate of 409 kilograms of enriched uranium. Tehran cites radiological hazards to block access to key sites, while signaling limited cooperation elsewhere. With talks stalled and a UN sanctions deadline looming, diplomats say the IAEA’s understanding of Iran’s nuclear program is rapidly deteriorating – giving Iran an opening to potentially race to a bomb in the absence of international oversight.
In message to Dalai Lama, Xi visits Tibet
Not two months after the Dalai Lama declared that his office – and not China – would pick his successor, Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday made only his second official visit to the autonomous, Himalayan region that his country officially annexed 60 years ago. The fact that the 72-year-old Xi went to the area, despite the health hazards of going to such high altitude, suggests he wanted to buttress his authority there – China’s leaders claim they have power over the Buddhist spiritual leader’s succession plans. His visit to Tibet led every major news bulletin in China, and also coincided with the recent announcement that China would build the world’s biggest dam there (read more on that here).
India caught in middle as Trump tests out new Russia policy
With friends like these! President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a new 25% tariff on India, one of the US’s closest allies in Asia.
Although India is a “friend”, Trump said, the country’s notoriously high trade barriers had prevented more commerce with the US. The new measures will go into effect on Saturday.
The move comes smack in the middle of rocky, ongoing trade talks between the US and India. Trump wants to crack open India’s vast market for American firms, while India is keen to protect certain domestic industries – particularly pharmaceuticals, auto parts, and agriculture – as well as the access of Indian students and high-skilled workers to the US.
India is in a tough spot – as Trump carries on talks with various countries at once, PM Narendra Modi doesn’t want to get stuck with a higher US tariff rate than other export-oriented Asian competitors who are all jockeying for access to the massive US market.
But Trump has put Modi in another, even trickier bind. He said India will pay a “fine” for its purchase of Russian oil. While details have yet to emerge, this looks like the first instance of Trump using so-called “secondary sanctions” to pressure Vladimir Putin, who has serially ignored Trump’s ongoing demands to end the war in Ukraine.
Earlier this month Trump threatened a tariff of 100% on any countries that trade with Russia unless the Kremlin stops the war within 50 days. This week he cut the deadline to “10 or 12 days.”
India is one of those countries, big league. Delhi purchases roughly 2 million barrels of oil daily from Russia, accounting for 40% of India’s total oil imports. That amount reflects a huge boost in Russian imports after 2022, when European sanctions over the invasion of Ukraine made Russian crude way cheaper for non-European buyers.
Analysts say that India could certainly go back to its traditional suppliers in the Middle East and Africa, but it would have to accept significantly higher costs compared to the blackballed Russian crude it’s gotten used to.
The dragon in the room. Still, if Trump is serious about landing a blow on Russia’s oil-dependent economy, he’ll sooner or later have to look towards the other
billion-person Asian power that gulps down Kremlin crude. China imports more than 2 million barrels of the stuff a day, about a fifth of its total imports. Together with India, the two countries buy more than 80% of Russia’s oil exports, accounting for about 5% of overall global crude demand.
Beijing is also Russia’s largest trade partner overall. With the US locked in tricky trade talks with its biggest global rival, is Trump ready to swing the secondary sanctions hammer at Beijing too?
Jair Bolsonaro, Donald Trump, and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Why Trump’s tariffs on Brazil will backfire
The president of the United States is overtly meddling in Brazil’s domestic politics. It's hard for Americans to even imagine that another country would dare threaten to tank the Dow unless the Supreme Court overturned a ruling or Congress repealed a law. Democrats and Republicans alike would howl if China tried to do that. Yet that's exactly what President Trump is doing to Brazil: flexing economic muscle to dictate the internal policies of a sovereign nation (and a democratic one, to boot). So much for his promise not to lecture other countries on how to govern their affairs (he should’ve clarified: as long as their leaders earn, or buy, his personal favor).
It’s a corrupt (ab)use of executive power. The Trump administration has articulated a number of shifting and often contradictory aims to justify its tariffs: shrinking bilateral trade deficits, raising revenue, reshoring supply chains, creating manufacturing jobs, squeezing China, wringing better deals. It’s certainly the case that some of these goals make less sense than others, tariffs aren’t always the right tool for the job, policy execution has been sloppy (remember the formula?), and Trump’s negotiation skills haven’t been up to snuff. But at least most of the tariffs have been guided by Trump’s sense of the national interest. They accordingly amount to legitimate statecraft. Not so with the Brazil tariff, which the president’s letter justifies purely on political grounds. There’s no national‑interest fig leaf – just an open bid to help a political opposition leader he likes.
It's also plainly illegal. Since “Liberation Day,” the White House has invoked a bunch of statutory authorities to unilaterally levy tariffs without Congressional legislation, most notably the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Usage of this law rests on the notion that the tariffs are a remedy for a “national economic emergency.” The US Supreme Court has yet to rule on the legality of IEEPA tariffs; it will probably do so in the fall, when I expect it to curb the president’s authority. But whatever the justices decide, we already know that the president doesn't have the legal authority to impose a tariff solely because he disagrees with the target’s domestic politics.
President Lula has no ability to give in to Trump’s demands. Even if he wanted to appease Trump, both Bolsonaro’s trial for plotting to assassinate Lula and overturn the 2022 election – a “witch hunt,” per Trump – and the new social media rules – seen as “censorship” in Washington – are beyond Lula’s constitutional jurisdiction. For Brasília they are non-negotiable matters of sovereignty. Nor does Lula have much trade leverage. Many US imports already face low duties; while Brazil could plausibly lower tariffs on some US goods like ethanol, deeper cuts require agreement by all four Mercosur members and their legislatures.
Even if he had the means to offer Trump the concessions he demands, Lula has no incentive to back down. On the contrary, the Brazilian president sees an electoral opportunity to lean into the tariff fight with the US at Bolsonaro's expense. Lula entered the 2026 campaign cycle as an unpopular incumbent presiding over a soft economy. Much like Trump’s “51st state” threats against Canada rallied Canadians around the flag and helped the Liberal Party’s Mark Carney stage a spectacular comeback, Trump’s threat to Brazil’s sovereignty and economy in direct support of Bolsonaro just handed Lula a flag-wrapped gift. It’s good politics for him to escalate the clash against Trump, cast himself as defender of Brazilian sovereignty, and blame his domestic nemesis for both the extremely unpopular foreign interference and any economic pain.
Don’t feel too bad for Bolsonaro. The former president has been trying to persuade Trump to more actively support him for months. Bolsonaro’s son Eduardo – a lawmaker who’s close with Trump’s sons and a top contender to succeed his father as the right-wing challenger to Lula – has been in Washington lobbying the White House for targeted financial sanctions against Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the lead judge in Bolsonaro’s trial (and, incidentally, a key champion of the social media regulation). Eduardo’s success in getting Trump to take up his cause is matched only by his failure to grasp the extent of Trump’s tariff obsession. Now he faces legal jeopardy at home for inviting foreign aggression, and his father’s grievance politics may finally come back to bite him. Whatever happens in 2026, the Bolsonaros have no one to blame but themselves.
The fight is set to get worse. Lula stepped up the escalatory rhetoric, refusing to accept Trump’s letter and threatening mirror tariffs. Diplomats will hunt for an off-ramp and try to buy time, but neither side is likely to blink before Aug. 1. The aggregate economic damage of 50% tariffs is manageable – Brazilian exports to the US account for less than 12% of Brazil’s total exports and about 2% of the country’s GDP, and some products (like oil) and sectors where Brazilian exporters have leverage are likely to be exempted. Trump’s letter also left the door open for individual companies to get waivers if they promise US investments. Still, the Brazilian industrial sector is highly dependent on the US export market (especially in products like steel, aerospace, cell phones, tools, and coffee), so the tariff won’t be entirely painless.
The cleanest de-escalation route runs through Bolsonaro himself: he’d need to directly ask Trump to ease or drop the tariffs, probably once the industrial lobby gets too loud and Lula’s poll numbers rise beyond comfort. That scenario is likelier than Lula caving or Trump unilaterally backing down. The White House has already ordered a Section 301 probe into various Brazilian policies that will give Trump a legally sturdier mechanism to impose sky-high duties on Brazil should courts clip his IEEPA wings.
Trump’s gambit will boomerang. The tariff will prop up his ally’s arch-enemy Lula, hurt US consumers (say goodbye to cheap cafezinho and OJ), and nudge Brazil closer to China and the EU – and away from Washington. As Trump keeps doing his darndest to deglobalize America, expect this pattern to keep repeating itself.
Shipping containers from China are seen at the Port of Los Angeles, in San Pedro, California, U.S., May 1, 2025.
Trump says he might back off on China tariffs – but Beijing holds firm
With US-China trade grinding to a halt, President Donald Trump told ABC News on Sunday that he would lower the 145% tariff imposed on China “at some point,” explaining that “otherwise you could never do business with them.” Beijing has expressed willingness to start talks if Washington is “prepared to … cancel its unilateral tariffs.” So China is playing a game of chicken, and Trump hasn’t quite swerved out of the way.
“There’s no clarity around what Trump wants from China,” says Eurasia Group’s Lauren Gloudeman. “It’s been a huge source of frustration for the Chinese side because since November they have been seeking to get that question answered.”
Beijing isn’t playing ball like Canada or Mexico, which made superficial concessions to Trump to postpone tariffs. China retaliated with 125% tariffs of its own and then moved to protect vulnerable parts of its economy by quietly issuing a series of exemptions on important US imports like aircraft engines, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals.
“China’s leadership cannot be seen as being coerced into giving in to Trump’s tactics,” says Gloudeman, explaining that Beijing is already facing the worst-case scenario for bilateral trade. “It’s quite insulting and humiliating, and the broader strategy for China is counting on Trump to back down first.”
President Donald Trump speaks as he signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House on April 9, 2025.
The Truth will set tariffs free
With stock markets plunging and US Treasury yields reaching new heights, US President Donald Trump finally reneged on parts of his widescale tariff plan on Wednesday, declaring a 90-day pause to the far-reaching “reciprocal” levies that he introduced just one week ago while leaving a 10% across-the-board duty in place. He also escalated the already-burgeoning trade war with China by increasing the tariff on their imports to 125%.
“I have authorized a 90 day PAUSE, and a substantially lowered Reciprocal Tariff during this period, of 10%, also effective immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump declared on Truth Social.
Trump’s announcement brought some much-needed relief to the countries facing these tariffs.
“This is a much smaller tariff wall. It is less disruptive. It has the potential for landing in a better place with most of the US trading partners,” said Eurasia Group’s geoeconomics expert Jens Larsen.
All in a day. The S&P 500 index surged more than 9% within a few hours of the announcement, bringing some rare good news to the American markets in an otherwise-tawdry week. The Nikkei jumped 9% on Thursday, recording its second-best ever day. As for China, Trump said the 125% tariff would be implemented immediately, before expressing optimism that the two superpowers could reach a deal. Beijing had announced earlier on Wednesday that it was imposing an additional 50% tariff on US imports, matching the extra duty that Trump had placed on Chinese imports on Tuesday and bringing the total levy to 84%.
Not out of the woods yet. Though stocks rose following Trump’s pause, Treasury yields haven’t fully recovered from the sharp moves of earlier this week, reflecting some potential damage to the US economic brand. The dollar has continued falling, too. The political ramifications of this are potentially more widespread than any market drops, as the higher yields make it more difficult for small businesses to access loans, with knock-on effects for the US economy.
“Fundamental uncertainty remains. Not only could tariffs be implemented in the future, but the predictability and credibility of US economic policy has taken a serious hit,” Larsen added. “And at the end, we still end up with a more rapidly fragmenting world.”
President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he leaves the White House for a trip to Florida on April 3, 2025.
Reality hits on new tariffs, but Trump says it’s ‘going very well’
The reviews are in: US President Donald Trump’s widespread tariff plan isn’t most loved, especially not with the markets. Stocks have plummeted, layoffs have begun, and confusion has metastasized about the bizarre method the United States used to calculate its tariff formula. And, of course, there’s a lawsuit.
The reaction from countries affected by the tariffs, though, was relatively muted. The European Union threatened to retaliate if the Trump administration didn’t withdraw these new duties but hasn’t explicitly made any moves yet. The United Kingdom drew up a list of potential US products it could tariff but hasn’t yet taken any specific actions. Australia outright won’t retaliate.
One exception. China introduced a 34% retaliatory tariff on US goods on Friday, matching what the White House imposed on them. The move turns the simmering tensions between the two superpowers into a full-fledged trade war.
Big bully. These major economies will take a hit, but it could be the smallest countries that suffer the most. Due to the tariff formula — which ostensibly involves dividing the US trade deficit with a country by the total amount of imports from it, and then halving this number — nations like Lesotho, Myanmar, and Nauru must deal with new duties approaching 50%. Their humble economies rely on producing for the mammoth US market, so these huge price hikes could devastate them.
Totally chill meeting. The new tariffs overshadowed a NATO summit in Brussels on Thursday, one that was supposed to focus on reaffirming the military alliance between the United States and its European allies. Despite US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s conciliatory tone, leaders across the pond expressed dismay at the new levies, with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock arguing that economic security was linked to “overall security.”
Whatever the complaints from Europe, Trump is unlikely to reverse course, says Eurasia Group trade and global supply chain expert Nancy Wei.
“The newly introduced tariffs under President Trump’s administration are designed to be a lasting ‘tariff wall’ around the US,” Wei said. “It is improbable that negotiations will lead to major tariff reductions or complete removal.”
While some thought Trump might reverse course in the face of market volatility, the US president didn’t seem too fazed by the chaos. He told reporters on Thursday that he thought it was “going very well” and likened the situation to a patient having surgery. “The markets are going to boom, the stock is going to boom, the country's going to boom,” he added.
Climate change activists hang a sign on Tower Bridge during a demonstration against the climate crisis, in central London, Britain, April 8, 2022.
Climate change, Trump tariffs, India rice rules
2.2: As the world gets hotter from climate change, we are using more energy to cool ourselves down, which is making climate change worse. According to the IEA, record-high temps in 2024 were responsible for half of the rise in emissions from energy – as severe heat waves caused air conditioning usage to surge, fueling electricity demand, and in turn raising emissions. This contributed to a 2.2% increase in global energy demand, up from 1.8% the year before. As a result, greenhouse gas emissions from energy consumption grew by 0.8% over the past year.
25: Donald Trump on Monday announced a 25% tariff on all imports from countries that buy Venezuelan oil or gas, starting April 2, alongside new tariffs on Venezuela itself. Venezuela will face a “secondary” tariff because it is the home to the Tren de Aragua gang, which Trump said is sending members to the US.
40: India has lifted its restrictions on rice exports, a move that should help curb food price inflation and increase agricultural workers’ salaries amid an economic slowdown in the country. Initially imposed after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine to prevent domestic shortages, the curbs drove up prices worldwide. As the largest rice exporter – accounting for over 40% of global rice exports – India’s decision should benefit poorer nations, especially in Africa, where rising food costs have fueled unrest. However, it will come at a cost for other rice-producing countries like Thailand and Pakistan, which worry that India will flood the market and prices will plummet.
93: US egg imports from Brazil surged 93% in February as a part of the Trump administration’s $1 billion plan to lower egg prices, which includes upping imports, helping farmers prevent the spread of the virus, and researching vaccine options. The eggs will end up in processed foods, freeing up more fresh eggs for grocery shelves. The US Food and Drug Administration is also reviewing a petition from the National Chicken Council to allow for the sale of eggs laid by chickens raised for meat – something it has previously forbidden because of salmonella risks.
200,000: Speaking of eggs, the Trump administration is seeking corporate sponsors for the White House Easter Egg Roll, a departure from tradition. Sponsorship packages range from $75,000 to $200,000, offering perks like logo placement, media engagement, and exclusive tickets. But there will still be a number of free tickets available.
President Donald Trump makes a special address remotely during the 55th annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 23, 2025.
The Big Tar-iffs: Will he or won’t he start a trade war?
The big Trump tar-“iff” now has a when: Feb. 1.
That’s when the busy new US president has promised to slap 25% tariffs on both Canada and Mexico. In his virtual address to the folks attending the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, President Donald Trump again singled out Canada for harsh treatment. “We have a tremendous deficit with Canada,” he said, reiterating his usual inaccurate tariff mantra. Trump claims the trade deficit is between US$200 and US$250 billion a year when it is significantly less than half of that, mainly due to energy exports.
Trump then followed up with his favorite new expansionist taunt. “You can always become a state,” he said to Canadians. “If you’re a state, we won’t have a deficit. We won’t have to tariff you.”
But what he said next was more dire because it was aimed directly at the industries that are core to the Canadian economy. “We don’t need them to make our cars,” President Trump said. “We don’t need their lumber, because we have our own forests. We don’t need their oil and gas. We have more than anybody.” In other words, we don’t need Canada at all.
Cue the economic peril clutching.
Let’s slow-walk through all this.
Will President Donald Trump really follow through with tariffs, or is it a negotiating tactic?
Yes, tariffs are coming the way cold comes in winter. Why so certain? Our general rule is to take the president of the United States both seriously and literally. As Trump said in his inaugural address, tariffs are now his primary source of government revenue, not just a tool for negotiation.
“Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens,” he announced. “It will be massive amounts of money pouring into our treasury coming from foreign sources.” He even floated the idea of an “External Revenue Service,” so tariffs are the flywheel in the engine that Trump promises will drive a golden age.
In his Davos speech on Thursday, the president emphasized the warning. “If you don’t make your product in America,” he said to a large group of CEOs, “then, very simply, you will have to pay a tariff, differing amounts, but a tariff which will direct hundreds of billions of dollars, even trillions of dollars, into our treasury to strengthen our economy and pay down debt.”
Is he right that high tariffs will really work for the US?
Not as promised. This is where the Trump math breaks down and politics and economics collide. Trump’s tariff threats will drive some businesses to keep factories in the US instead of, say, Canada. For example, this week Stellantis announced it was going to build the new Dodge Durango in Detroit and not move it to Canada as initially thought. It will also reopen a previously closed plant in Illinois to build another vehicle. So, expect some short-term “wins” from the America-first, protectionist agenda.
After all, in his first term, Trump used tariffs on goods like steel, aluminum, and products from China to more than double the amount the government collected from duties to about $111 billion.
Sounds like a lot, but it’s not. In 2023, the US government took in over $4.2 trillion in income and payroll tax. Even with 10% tariffs on all goods from China and 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods, the US government would take in only another $140 billion in 2025, according to the Committee for a Responsible Budget.
That’s not nearly enough to finance new tax cuts. For example, Trump has promised to extend his 2017 tax cuts in 2026. The Congressional Budget Office estimates doing so will cost about $4.7 trillion in lost revenue between now and 2035. That leaves a Grand Canyon-size hole that revenue from tariffs and savings from government cuts can never fill. Deficits will explode.
So will tariffs really be 25% across the board on Canada and Mexico, or will President Trump come down to a more manageable level on a few select goods?
That remains very unclear. The president didn’t slap these tariffs on week one, revealing they may have dropped as a symbolic priority for him. That opens up some room to maneuver to negotiate until the Feb. 1 deadline, and now there is even further hope for exceptions. The president has also asked for a report on trade and unfair practices to be delivered to him by April 1, which offers yet another potential delay in the tariff war. There will be lobbying, networking, and a full-bore strategy to give Canada some kind of carveout.
Still, neither date removes the possibility of the promised tariffs happening at some level. The president needs revenue, and tariffs are his preferred tool, despite the math.
Will Canada retaliate dollar for dollar?
Yes. The same strategy Canada deployed in Trump 1.0 during the steel and aluminum tariffs will be deployed again, and the list amounting to CA$37 billion worth of goods — including things like Florida Orange juice — is already made and ready to be deployed. After all, if Trump goes through with the tariffs, Canada could get pushed into a recession, with up to 5% of its GDP hit. While goods and services in both countries will get more expensive for citizens, it will hurt Canada much more for one reason: Canada sends almost three-quarters of its exports to the US, compared to just a little more than 17% of US exports crossing the other way.
If there are 25% tariffs across the board, will Canada use the nuclear option and try to cut off energy exports to the US, risking a full national unity crisis?
Very unclear. All the premiers and territory leaders met this week with Justin Trudeau to align their retaliation strategy, which includes energy … except for Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, for whom any inclusion of fossil fuel exports in a trade war is strictly off-limits. This is the lifeblood of the Alberta economy, after all, and she is protective of her province. However, her position deeply hampers a united Canadian response and allows the new US administration to deploy a divide-and-conquer strategy, knowing they can absorb any trade shocks better than Canada, especially if they do not include energy.
Is Trump still serious about taking over Canada by economic force?
Unclear. That view has certainly created a surge of patriotism in Canada and escalated tough trade talk as politicians jockey to wear the “Captain Canada” label. But if there is a desire to have an integrated North American economy — newsflash! — we already have one.
Energy alone is the best example. The US imports 24% of its crude oil from Canada, and that is very hard to replace because US refineries are retooled to process Canadian heavy crude oil, not the kind of oil the US extracts from fracking. Not only that, when looking at all energy products that flow across the border, like natural gas, there is a combined network of pipelines in North America that is over 281,000 miles long! With the free trade agreement, integrated fossil fuel pipelines, and hydroelectric systems in the East supplying electricity to the Northeastern states, it would be hard to find two more interconnected economies anywhere in the world.
In other words, on Feb. 1, the US and Canada are headed for a trade war they don’t need over a prize they both already have.