A shot at Putin?

A still image taken from video shows a flying object exploding in an intense burst of light near the dome of the Kremlin Senate building during the alleged Ukrainian drone attack in Moscow.
A still image taken from video shows a flying object exploding in an intense burst of light near the dome of the Kremlin Senate building during the alleged Ukrainian drone attack in Moscow.
EYEPRESS via Reuters Connect

Early on Wednesday, Russian authorities reported the takedown of two unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, directly over the Kremlin. The Russian government immediately accused Ukraine of trying to kill Vladimir Putin and released a video it says corroborates the story. Ukrainian officials quickly and adamantly denied the charge and warned that Russia might want to use this false story as a pretext for some dramatic attack inside Ukraine.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky later denied any involvement, and on Thursday the Kremlin attempted to shift the narrative by blaming ... the US.

Moscow's mayor, meanwhile, responded by announcing a ban on unauthorized drone flights over the city. (Unidentified drones flying over Moscow’s city center were OK before Wednesday???) If the drone attack was real, it’s an extraordinary admission of security vulnerability for Moscow, whether it came from inside Ukrainian territory 350 miles away or from a Ukrainian or Ukrainian-sympathetic group somewhere inside Russia.

And it’s not as though Putin needs an excuse to order deadly new attacks on Ukraine. One thing is clear: Russia is increasingly on edge as Ukraine prepares to launch a widely expected counteroffensive.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

What is motivating the Starmer UK government from seeking new security treaties with Germany and with Paris? What is the effect of Italy's very restrictive policies on migration and what's happening in the Mediterranean on the migration flows across the Mediterranean? Carl Bildt, former prime minister of Sweden and co-chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations, shares his perspective on European politics from Tabiano Castello in Italy.

Attendees of Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) campaign event for the Saxony state elections leave, as counter protestors stand in the background, in Dresden, Germany, August 29, 2024.
REUTERS/Lisi Niesner

Populist opposition parties of the right and the left are set to make big gains in local elections in two key eastern German states this Sunday.

At a joint press conference in front of the Constitutional Court in Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea, on August 29, 2024, youth climate litigants and citizen groups involved in climate lawsuits chant slogans emphasizing that the court ruling marks not the end, but the beginning of climate action. The Constitutional Court rules that the failure to set carbon emission reduction targets for the period from 2031 to 2049 is unconstitutional and orders the government to enact alternative legislation by February 2026.
Chris Jung via Reuters Connect

South Korea’s constitutional court has ruled that the country’s climate change measures are insufficient for protecting the rights of citizens, particularly those of future generations.

U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan meets Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China August 29, 2024.
REUTERS/Trevor Hunnicutt/Pool.

Chinese President Xi Jinping struck a conciliatory tone when he met with US national security adviser Jake Sullivan on Thursday, after three days of talks aimed at managing tensions in the US-China relationship.

Ari Winkleman

It used to be that the conservative right supported free trade and globalization, while the progressive left wanted protectionism for local industries. But in this campaign cycle — it’s as if a sequel titled “The Tariffs Strike Back” has been released — we must wonder, writes Publisher Evan Solomon: Is this the beginning of the end of globalization and the rise of a new age of tariffs?