As the US withdraws from Afghanistan all eyes are on Pakistan

As the US withdrawal from Afghanistan is now well underway, all eyes have turned to a country at the heart of the decades-long struggle for dominance there… Pakistan, where the effects of 20 years of Afghan war have been felt acutely.

Background. During the Cold War, the US and Pakistan worked closely together to foment jihadist resistance to Soviet influence in, and then occupation of, Afghanistan. But after the Soviet collapse, the bilateral relationship got more complicated, especially post 9/11, when the US went to war against the Afghan Taliban regime that still enjoyed close ties to the highly influential Pakistani military.

The Americans want more. Withdrawing now after 20 years of war, the CIA and other US intelligence and security forces still want to maintain a foothold in the region to monitor terror groups — like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda — as well as to surveil the Taliban, which has made massive territorial gains in recent weeks.

Washington has asked Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan for access to its airspace and military bases to continue its surveillance operations and launch combat missions in the (expected) event of a Taliban takeover. But Khan has said, unequivocally, that he won't acquiesce to these demands.

Indeed, Pakistan's government has a host of domestic and geopolitical considerations to take into account in the face of US pressure. For example...

The power of the security apparatus. Pakistan's security establishment is described by critics as a "state within a state." The extensive Inter-Services Intelligence agency has historically maintained close ties with regional terror groups and provided intelligence to the Afghan Taliban in the post-Soviet era. More recently, senior ISI officials were reportedly involved in harboring 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden, who in 2011 was discovered hiding in a compound just a stone's throw away from the Pakistan Military Academy.

There's no doubt that the ISI plays a significant role in framing Pakistan's foreign policy, and now it's warning Khan against making overtures to the Americans.

Pakistanis don't love America. After 9/11, Pakistanis were mostly supportive or indifferent on whether its leadership should allow US forces to traverse Pakistan, a role that earned the country the designation of a major non-NATO ally and the money that comes with it. US aid to Pakistan after a devastating earthquake in 2005 also earned the Americans goodwill.

But that changed after a series of US drone attacks in Pakistan during the "War on Terror" killed civilians and traumatized communities. It didn't help that the US breached Pakistani airspace to kill bin Laden.

By 2012, three-quarters of Pakistanis said America was "an enemy." And the antipathy only intensified when in 2017 President Trump chided Pakistan for harboring terrorists and then — playing on Pakistanis' worst insecurities — called on India to play a bigger role in maintaining stability in Afghanistan. Clearly, it would be political suicide for Khan and his ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party to pursue an agreement with the Americans, who are loathed by a majority of his constituents.

Pakistan's former foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar, told GZERO Media that "the reason the US is getting out of Afghanistan in an almost rushed manner is because of the opposition in some quarters in Afghanistan to foreign bases and foreign troops." She said that if the US sets up bases in Pakistan, "we end up channeling all of that rage and extremist reaction towards Pakistan. I think it's safe to say that every country's primary responsibility is to protect itself and its own."

Global friends and foes. The world was a very different place when the US invaded Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003). Back then, Pakistan was way more reliant on the United States, the singular world power, for economic and military aid. That's no longer the case.

China, slated to become the world's biggest economy as soon as 2028, is much more invested in Afghanistan and Pakistan — and Central Asia more broadly. Importantly, it has made the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, worth $46 billion, a flagship of its massive Belt and Road Initiative. Beijing has flushed Islamabad with cash in recent years, and it's paying off: PM Khan now says China has been one of Pakistan's most reliable friends in times of need.

Importantly, Pakistan also hopes that an increased Chinese presence in Afghanistan will help build a bulwark against India, Pakistan's arch nemesis, which has long sought to maintain some influence across the border.

Looking ahead: The US' desperate search for military bases confirms what some skeptics have said for months: after 20 years of war, the US doesn't have a plan for the day after Afghanexit. So, what comes next?

"The situation is very volatile… I fear the spill over from Afghanistan to find its way in Pakistan and perhaps a repeat of the extremism/terrorism cycle," Khar warns.

More from GZERO Media

Delegates affiliated to Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) react during a meeting for the planned signing, later postponed, of a political charter that would provide for a "Government of Peace and Unity" to govern the territories the force controls in Nairobi, Kenya, February 18, 2025.
REUTERS/Monicah Mwangi
The U.S. and Russian delegations meet at Diriyah Palace, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, February 18, 2025.
REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool

It was the first high level meeting between the two countries since Moscow's full scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Police officers stand guard as Congolese youngsters jostle to receive relief food, after fleeing from renewed clashes between M23 rebels and the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. February 18, 2025.
REUTERS/Evrard Ngendakumana

100: M23 rebels – a Rwanda-backed militia – took control of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s second-largest city, Bukavu, on Monday.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, right, sits beside then-Senior Counselor to the President Steve Bannon, left, as President Donald Trump hosts a strategy and policy forum with chief executives of major US companies at the White House in February 2017.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

The latest salvo at Musk from Steve Bannon reflects the sharpening of already rough-edged rivalries within Trump’s circle between hard-core populists and hyper-libertarians.

People sit in a restaurant as Argentina's President Javier Milei is seen on television during an interview, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on Feb. 17, 2025.
REUTERS/Pedro Lazaro Fernandez

Argentina’s flamboyant libertarian President Javier Milei is at the center of a cryptocurrency scandal that’s already having legal consequences. Whether there will be political consequences remains to be seen.

Walmart is fueling American jobs and strengthening communities by investing in local businesses. Athletic Brewing landed a deal with Walmart in 2021. Since then, co-founders Bill Shufelt and John Walker have hired more than 200 employees and built a150,000-square-foot brewery in Milford, CT. Athletic Brewing is one of many US-based suppliers working with Walmart. By 2030, the retailer is estimated to support the creation of over 750,000 US jobs by investing an additional $350 billion in products made, grown, or assembled in America. Learn more about Walmart’s commitment to US manufacturing.

In this new episode of Tools and Weapons, Microsoft's Vice Chair and President Brad Smith speaks with Jeffrey Ding, professor at George Washington University and author of "Technology and the Rise of Great Powers." Ding challenges conventional wisdom on how nations achieve global dominance, arguing that the key isn’t just developing breakthrough technologies like AI but effectively integrating and scaling them. They explore what history teaches us about the role of innovation in shaping great powers — and what it will take for the US to remain one. Subscribe and find new episodes monthly, wherever you listen to podcasts.