China and Philippines sign South China Sea deal

​A Philippine flag flutters from BRP Sierra Madre, a dilapidated Philippine Navy ship that has been aground since 1999 and became a Philippine military detachment on the disputed Second Thomas Shoal, part of the Spratly Islands, in the South China Sea March 29, 2014.
A Philippine flag flutters from BRP Sierra Madre, a dilapidated Philippine Navy ship that has been aground since 1999 and became a Philippine military detachment on the disputed Second Thomas Shoal, part of the Spratly Islands, in the South China Sea March 29, 2014.
REUTERS/Erik De Castro/File Photo/File Photo

Manila announced Sunday it had reached a “provisional agreement” with Beijing aimed at establishing an arrangement in the South China Sea that both sides can live with — without renouncing territorial claims. The text of the deal has not yet been released.

The agreement builds off last week’s announcement of the establishment of presidential hotlines and signals a desire for de-escalation by both countries – following a serious clash on June 17. But the key word in this agreement is “provisional” as both Beijing and Manila are already showing irreconcilable differences in their positions.

China had previously told Manila it could not bring construction materials to the wreck of the Sierra Madre, a decrepit hulk deliberately beached on the South Thomas Shoal by Manila to give it de facto control. Without repairs, the ship will likely break apart soon. But Beijing claims Manila agreed to give China advanced notice and allowed inspections of shipments sent to the marines it keeps stationed there carrying food and supplies. A senior Filipino official told the Associated Press that the final deal did not require the Philippines to pre-notify the Chinese of shipments.

What to watch? A deal to cool temperatures in the South China Sea would be welcome news for all parties, including the US. “The next big test,” says Eurasia Group senior China analyst Jeremy Chan, “will be how both Manila and Beijing behave on future resupply missions, and whether either side can cede any ground.”

More from GZERO Media

Mastercard’s Start Path Open Banking and Embedded Finance startup engagement program is designed to support and collaborate with fintechs to democratize financial services while keeping consumers in control of their data. One participant, Payitoff, is a white-label solution that provides banks and fintechs with the technology to help people manage student loans and other debt. Built on online banking technology, Payitoff can be embedded into fintech and banking platforms to provide clients with a 360-degree picture of their financial profile. The benefits can be life-changing: Reducing monthly debt repayments can improve credit scores, which gives people a better chance of getting mortgages to buy homes or loans to launch businesses. Learn more here.

- YouTube

Are we in a 21st-century space race with China? And if so, who’s winning? On Ian Explains, Ian Bremmer breaks down China’s ambitious space program, which in the last few years has sent a rover to Mars, built a space station, and returned samples from the far side of the moon–something no country has done before.

Annie Gugliotta

There are less than two months before the US presidential election. If you are one of the true holdouts who is still perplexed about whom to vote for — or whether to vote at all — we are here to help. We put together a list of the best reasons an imaginary moderate might vote for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

A destroyed car stands in front of a house full of bullet holes in Sudan.
Mudathir Hameed/Reuters

Sudan says the UAE is supporting the RSF’s atrocities in the Darfur by airlifting weapons to remote airfields in Chad, where militants exploit border openings meant for fleeing refugees to move arms.

The presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is shown at a watch party hosted by the Travis County and Hays County Republicans at Pinballz Kingdom in Buda on Tuesday, September 10, 2024.
Reuters

We are now in the “debate over the debate” phase of the presidential campaign. Who actually won? Were the moderators biased? How will it impact votes in the swing states where this whole election hinges?