The US-China rivalry is putting innovation at risk – is it worth it?

Back in January, we warned that an intensifying "Tech Cold War" between the US and China over technology and trade could plunge global innovation into a deep freeze as both countries impose fresh restrictions on the free flows of money, people, and information that (throughout history) have powered new ideas.

We're not at the winter solstice of innovation just yet, but the US's move last week to restrict Chinese networking equipment giant Huawei's access to US markets and technology sent an awfully chilly wind through the tech sector.

Here are two ways that a decoupling of the Chinese and American tech sectors could damage innovation in the US:

  • Less good money: Huawei spends roughly $10 billion a year buying hardware and software from US firms. Total Chinese tech industry purchases are many times greater than that. A portion of that money is reinvested by Silicon Valley in R&D to help develop the next generation of innovative tech products. If Chinese firms can't – or won't – buy from American companies, a lot of R&D cash will vanish.
  • Fewer good brains: US semiconductor companies are already struggling to hire highly coveted Chinese engineers as the Trump administration slow-rolls their visa applications over national security fears. But top tech talent is hard to come by, and there aren't always qualified workers from the US or other countries available to pick up the slack.

The upshot: The United States has plenty of well-founded grievances with how China runs its economy and its increasingly powerful tech sector. But the costs of Washington's more confrontational approach are already becoming apparent. Those costs will rise further if the US and China's deeply linked tech sectors decouple more fully and formally, as some China hawks in the US hope. At what point do the costs start to outweigh the benefits?

More from GZERO Media

Small businesses play an outsized role in driving economic output on the local and global levels. But smaller margins and fewer resources than larger companies make them far more vulnerable to climate shocks. We must reduce the climate risks facing smaller enterprises while accelerating their ability to deliver climate solutions and play a central role in the transition to a low-carbon, regenerative economy. A new report, produced by Christensen Global and supported by the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth, reveals three things small businesses need to unlock their power to accelerate climate-smart inclusive growth: data, capital, and wrap-around support.

US President Joe Biden delivers remarks in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington after Israel and Lebanon accepted a ceasefire deal on Nov. 26, 2024.
Yuri Gripas/ABACAPRESS.COM via Reuters

The Israeli Security Cabinet has approved a ceasefire for Lebanon, President Joe Biden announced on Tuesday, welcoming the opportunity to start reestablishing peace in the Middle East. Early Wednesday, 13 months of fighting ended as the ceasefire took hold, and thousands of displaced Lebanese civilians began returning to their homes in the South.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum speaks after reading a letter to be sent to U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, warning that tariffs would cause inflation and job losses in both countries, at National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico, November 26, 2024.
Carlos Ramos Mamahua/Presidencia de Mexico/Handout via REUTERS
Art by Annie Gugliotta/GZERO Media

With the US Thanksgiving holiday approaching, millions of American families will soon sit down to a turkey dinner. That makes it as good a time as any to ask an important question: Why are turkeys, which are not actually from Turkey, called turkeys? No other animal is named for so many countries that it's not actually from.