Climate change trade wars

Activists dressed as world leaders protest against the rising water levels during a demonstration on the Forth and Clyde Canal as the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) takes place, in Glasgow, Scotland, Britain, November 9, 2021.

The COP26 climate summit in Glasgow is almost done and dusted, with some ambitious commitments and breakthroughs from governments and corporations to more aggressively tackle the climate disaster. Yet, though there seems to be broad agreement on what needs to be done to stop the planet getting hotter — like getting to Net Zero emissions over the next few decades — big disagreements remain on how to pull it off.

As countries try to turn jobs green while also boosting exports to keep foreign cash flowing in, reliance on protectionist economic policies is becoming an increasing point of friction between governments. Here are two juicy examples where this dynamic is playing out.

The US rumbles with Mexico and Canada over cars. The Biden administration has united Mexico and Canada in rage over its proposal to roll out financial incentives for Americans to buy US-made electric vehicles, with additional tax credits for buying a car with a US-made battery or made at a unionized factory. Some American political nerds weren't surprised at all given Biden's longtime bonafides as a pro-union warrior.

Ottawa, however, was shocked and is now furious, calling it a protectionist move that'll encourage automakers to build electric vehicle factories in the US rather than Canada. That's a massive deal because the auto industry is one of Canada's largest manufacturing sectors, contributing more than $12.5 billion to its GDP in 2020. Mexico, for its part, is also riled up, saying that the US proposal undermines its plans to transition its equally crucial auto industry to electric models, which is central to Mexico's overall climate change mitigation strategy.

Mexico City and Ottawa have accused Washington of violating the USMCA — a NAFTA replacement that was painstaking to negotiate — which was supposed to guarantee a level playing field for the three countries. Canada and Mexico could now bring a case forward under the pact's dispute mechanisms.

The most exclusive club in Europe: carbon. The European Union, which has made some of the most ambitious climate pledges in the world to date, has proposed a carbon tax on specific imports entering the bloc, including steel, fertilizer, oil and cement. Essentially, Brussels wants to impose carbon tariffs so that foreign producers will be subject to the same financial burdens as European manufacturers when making similar products.

Indeed, by putting a price on carbon emissions — and forcing EU-reliant economies to pay up or lose big business — the European Commission has figured out a way to pay, at least in part, for its very expensive Green Deal.

What's more, some countries are up in arms that Brussels has been pushing for wealthy, like-minded countries to join its carbon pricing scheme in exchange for access to the EU's single market, excluding tariffs and quotas already in place for other goods. (Canada is now looking into its own scheme). Critics say that setting up a "trans-Atlantic climate club" – whereby all states would either impose a border carbon tax or an equivalent emission trading system – is discriminatory: Australia's coal-loving Prime Minister Scott Morrison, for example, said the push is "simply trade protectionism by another name." Meanwhile, Brazil, South Africa, China and India have also complained that a far-reaching carbon border tax would be a "trade barrier," unfairly penalizing developing nations who are still reliant on fossil fuels to grow their economies.

While the EU has pulled back a bit in recent months — giving countries five years to get their climate priorities in check — the US has not ruled out imposing tit-for-tat tariffs if Brussels slaps carbon levies on US goods. Meanwhile, countries like China, Russia and Turkey — which stand to lose a lot from an EU carbon tax — have accused Brussels of violating international trade principles.

What now? Some climate policy advocates are worried that using coercive tools like tariffs and tax credits could backfire, giving ammunition to the naysayers who believe that climate policy makes for bad economics.

In the end, will global efforts to protect the planet run aground on national efforts to protect certain industries?



More from GZERO Media

People attend a rally to protest against the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu as part of a corruption investigation in Istanbul, Turkey, on March 29, 2025.
REUTERS/Umit Bektas

Hundreds of thousands of people flooded the streets of Istanbul this weekend to protest the detainment of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, a popular contender for the next presidential election.

Democratic-backed Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford and Republican-backed Waukesha County Circuit Judge Brad Schimel square off in their only debate until their April 1 election.
Brian Cahn/ZUMA Press Wire via Reuters

Elections are back in the United States — and so is the money. Six months after the 2024 US presidential vote, Wisconsinites will head to the polls Tuesday to decide whether liberal candidate Susan Crawford or her opponent, conservative Brad Schimel,will tip the ideological balance of the state Supreme Court. The liberals currently have a 4-3 advantage.

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shakes hands with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba at the Prime Minister's office in Tokyo on March 30, 2025.
POOL via ZUMA Press Wire via Reuters

In his first trip to Asia this weekend, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth called for greater military cooperation between Tokyo and Washington.

People walk by as a painter repaints an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, on Saturday, March 29, 2025.
Majid Asgaripour/WANA via Reuters

On Sunday, US President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Iran, threatening to bomb the country and impose secondary tariffs if Tehran fails to reach a new agreement on its nuclear program. In a telephone interview with NBC News, Trump stated, “If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing. It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

President Donald Trump waves as he walks before departing for Florida from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on March 28, 2025.

REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Is the bloom off the bromance between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin? On Sunday, Trump took Putin to task over Russia’s foot-dragging on a ceasefire in Ukraine and threatened to tariff Russian oil and impose more sanctions on the country.

Rescuers work at the site of a building that collapsed after the strong earthquake in Mandalay, Myanmar, on Sunday, March 30, 2025.
REUTERS/Stringer

The death toll continues to rise in Myanmar after a devastating 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck near the central city of Mandalay on March 28. Approximately 1,700 people are dead and over 3,400 injured, with the US Geological Service estimating that casualties could top 10,000. Relief operations are further complicated by Myanmar’s ongoing civil war, though a two-week ceasefire was declared on Sunday.

Listen: Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, made his fortune-breaking industries—space, cars, social media—and is now trying to break the government… in the name of fixing it. But what happens when Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ ethos collides with the machinery of federal bureaucracy? On the GZERO World Podcast, Ian Bremmer sits down with WIRED Global Editorial Director Katie Drummond to unpack the implications of Musk’s deepening role in the Trump administration and what’s really behind his push into politics.

France's President Emmanuel Macron speaks during a press conference following a summit for the "coalition of the willing" at the Elysee Palace in Paris on March 27, 2025.

LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

At the third summit of the so-called “coalition of the willing” for Ukraine on Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron proposed a multinational “reassurance force” to deter Russian aggression once a ceasefire is in place – and to engage if attacked.