Explainer: Why there’s a Y in Kyiv, but no “the” in Ukraine

Ari Winkleman

Generations of Americans have known the Ukrainian capital, and the eponymous chicken dish, as “Kiev.” But most Western media now use “Kyiv.” Why?

The simple answer is that “Kyiv” reflects the Ukrainian version of the city’s name, while “Kiev” comes from the Russian.

The two languages are closely related, but different — think Spanish and Portuguese — and both are spoken in Ukraine. For centuries, Moscow promoted the use of Russian there as the primary language of business and politics.

But since 2014, when independent Ukraine first found itself at war with Russia, language has gotten more political. Ethnic Ukrainians have made an effort to boost the use of Ukrainian in public life, and urged Western governments and media to use the capital’s Ukrainian spelling. In 2019, the US government officially adopted “Kyiv.”

Ok, but how is it pronounced? “Kee-EV” is a loose approximation of the Russian version, which is now a no-no. Lately, some are going with “Keeve” to approximate the Ukrainian – and while that’s not precisely it, it’s close enough. Anything but “kee-EV” and you’re fine.

One thing you should never, ever do, however, is call the country “The Ukraine.” The word “Ukraine” itself comes from a Slavic root meaning “borderlands.” “The Ukraine” connotes an area that is merely a region rather than an independent state or country: think “The Midwest” or “The Riviera.” During the days when Ukraine was part of the Russian and Soviet empires, that label made enough sense. But since 1991, the independent country is simply called “Ukraine.”

These days, using “The Ukraine” is at best a habitual mistake. But at worst, it’s a nod to the position of some Russian nationalists — like Putin himself — who still see Ukraine as, basically, just another part of Russia.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

The world is quietly being reshaped by a demographic time bomb: Birthrates are plummeting, and the global population is rapidly aging. By 2050, one in six people will be over 65. While the overall population is still increasing—driven by growth in developing countries like Nigeria and Pakistan—experts predict it will peak in about 60 years. The shift to depopulation will have huge implications for the future of work, healthcare, and retirement. So what can we do about it? On Ian Explains, Ian Bremmer breaks down the different strategies governments are using to try to get people to have more kids, particularly in East Asia, where the population crisis is severe.

The Puerto Princesa Forest Restoration Initiative is a project to plant more than 400,000 seedlings to restore Palawan forests destroyed by Super Typhoon Odette in the Philippines. It’s part of a larger global effort by the Priceless Planet Coalition, launched by Mastercard with Conservation International and the World Resources Institute, to fund the restoration of 100 million trees around the world. These projects extend beyond carbon sequestration — they’re aimed at creating economic opportunities for women in the region, enabling them to better provide for their families. Read more about how many local women and community members are leading the charge on nursery construction, maintenance, and seedling production.

- YouTube

Listen: The world is on the brink of one of the most fundamental demographic shifts in modern human history: populations are getting older, and birth rates are plummeting. By 2050, one in six people on Earth will be over 65, which will have a huge impact on the future of work, healthcare, and social security. On the GZERO World Podcast, Ian Bremmer sits down with Jennifer Sciubba, President & CEO of the Population Reference Bureau, to discuss declining fertility, the aging crisis, and why government efforts all over the world to get people to have more babies don’t seem to be working.

Republican U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz speaks at a campaign rally for Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump in Henderson, Nevada U.S. October 31, 2024.
REUTERS/Mike Blake

President-elect Donald Trump’s unconventional picks for a number of important Cabinet positions in his second administration have set him on a collision course with the GOP-led Senate.

Accompanied by tugs, the LNG tanker "Hellas Diana" transports a cargo of LNG to the "Deutsche Ostsee" energy terminal.
Stefan Sauer/Reuters

While other countries in Europe still import small amounts of Russian LNG under long-term contracts, the EU broadly is looking to import more of the stuff from the growing American market.

Luisa Vieira

Cabinet-building has long been crucial for both the success of a presidency and the direction of the United States. From the presidencies of Abraham Lincoln to Donald Trump, the team often tells the tale of power. Publisher Evan Solomon looks at what Trump’s Cabinet picks are telling us all.