It’s debate night in America!

U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden participate in their first 2020 presidential campaign debate held on the campus of the Cleveland Clinic at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S., September 29, 2020.
REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Tonight’s face-off between Joe Biden and Donald Trump will be the first debate of its kind.

For one thing, bucking the tradition of recent years, there will be no live studio audience. For another, the mics will cut off automatically if candidates speak over time or out of turn.

But mostly, it’ll be the first time a sitting US president has debated his predecessor. That makes this a meeting of two largely known quantities. We already know both men as people and as presidents. The horizon of new things to learn about either of them is very, very limited.

Still, people will watch. Debates may be getting less useful – a new report by the NPR program Open to Debate charts the stark demise of the format over the past 20 years – but people do still watch them.

After the Super Bowl, debates remain one of America’s biggest TV draws. Whether people tune in as persuadable voters or as bloodthirsty spectators is a good question, but tune in they will. In our GZERO Twitter poll – which by the way is still open here – so far about 75% of respondents say they’ll be watching.

Will the debate matter? In a deeply polarized country choosing between two radically different candidates, most folks have their minds made up, it’s true.

But the margins matter. Biden won in 2020 by carrying a few swing states by fewer than 100,000 votes. For both men, pulling even a tiny percentage of persuadable voters back from the other guy, away from a third-party candidate, or off the couch to vote at all, could be the difference. And as a shameless plug for our Twitter poll here again, nearly 60% of you said it will matter. That’s a lot!

Policy vs. Perception. Abortion. Ukraine. Taxes. Gaza. Health Care. Immigration. We’ll hear about all of those things. But in the end, many people may be looking for something more basic from Biden and Trump.

“This is a lot more about how they appear than what they actually say,” says Eurasia Group boss (and GZERO Media founder) Ian Bremmer.

Biden needs to shake growing concerns about his age by showing that he’s vigorous and mentally capable of running a superpower for another four years. Trump, ever the chaos candidate, needs to show he can keep himself under control for a reasonably civilized 90-minute conversation.

With that as the bar – and it’s a low one – one candidate may be at greater risk than the other, says Bremmer. “I think there's a lot more downside for Biden precisely because his age is perceived to be so much more of a problem,” he says. And unlike in, say, the State of the Union, a set-piece where Biden was fired up, “this is a live-fire exercise, there's more ways you can go badly.”

But over to you: In the run-up to Thursday night’s presidential debate, we asked GZERO readers to play moderator and draft questions for the two main contenders, Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Some even took up the challenge of posing the toughest questions either candidate could face.

Our inbox was soon overflowing with thoughtful responses like these:

Andrew Vickery, Lenox, MA

“It seems that America is on the path to become its own worst enemy. Lack of trust in democratic institutions. Declining public education. Vulnerable critical infrastructure (in terms of security). Identity politics. What will you do to strengthen the US domestically and decrease polarization? How will you remind Americans how lucky we are to be born here?”

_____

Emily Vondrak, Sioux City, IA

Tough question for Biden: “It will be hardest for him to defend his strategy at the Southern border. There is really no good answer. A close second is making any definitive statement about Israel. It will need to be somewhat vague or he will further alienate a portion of his own party.”

Tough question for Trump: “He will use his conviction as further evidence of what he considers a political agenda, but it will be hard to talk about that being political and not admit the case against Hunter Biden was also politically motivated – it would be drenched with hypocrisy.”

_____

David Taylor, Bourne End, UK

“Given that the mental acuity of both candidates is declining rapidly and the majority of the electorate would prefer other candidates, why have you not stepped aside in favour of a younger candidate?”

_____

Anonymous

For Biden: “Did you ask your son not to accept a position with Burisma when you were engaged in questioning the Ukrainian investigation of Burisma in order to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest?”

_____

Richard Willerton, Vancouver WA

“Draw a map of the world with the names of all the countries you have time for. The loser gets his ass kicked by the winner.”

For the full set of responses, click here.

More from GZERO Media

Syrian forces head to Latakia after fighters linked to Syria's ousted leader Bashar Assad mounted a deadly attack on government forces on Thursday, March 6, 2025.

REUTERS/Mahmoud Hassano

Nearly 50 people were killed on Thursday in the deadliest clashes Syria has seen since the overthrow of Bashar Assad. Pro-Assad militants attacked security checkpoints around the western coastal town of Jableh, a stronghold of the former regime.

The Liberian-flagged tanker Ice Energy, chartered by the US government, takes Iranian oil from Iranian-flagged Lana (formerly Pegas) as part of a civil forfeiture action off the shore of Karystos, on the Island of Evia, Greece, in May 2022.
REUTERS/Costas Baltas/File Photo

The Trump administration is reportedly considering a strategy to disrupt Iran’s oil exports by stopping and inspecting Iranian oil tankers at sea. The US would use the Proliferation Security Initiative, established in 2003 to prevent the trafficking of weapons of mass destruction, as a legal justification for the inspections.

Donald Trump issues a proclamation from the Oval Office
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

US presidents don’t typically talk to organizations the US government has labeled terrorist groups, but Donald Trump is not a typical US president.

President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol on March 4, 2025.

Win McNamee/Pool via REUTERS

You didn’t need to sit through all 99 minutes of Trump’s peroration to know that he gave himself an A++ on his first six weeks in office, writes GZERO Publisher Evan Solomon. But if Trump gets to grade himself, maybe it’s time for a more objective report card — one that looks at two criteria: Trump as a dealmaker and Trump as a manager.

The Energy Security Hub at the 2025 Munich Security Conference featured in-depth discussions on energy innovation, security, and market viability. Fatih Birol, IEA executive director, discussed growing global energy demand, especially the rapid rise in electricity outpacing overall growth. He noted electricity demand is projected to increase six times faster than total energy in 10 years, underscoring the need for electrification and grid expansion. As energy systems become decentralized and digitalized, the CEO of E.ON, Leonhard Birnbaum, said: “You’re either fully digitized – or you’re done.” Key takeaways: Energy security requires developing and securing electricity grids Technological openness is a unifying element for getting to net zero Bridge the “Valley of Death” to scale markets New global partnerships will help Europe stay competitive Public acceptance will strengthen democracy You can read the full Executive Summary from the BMW Foundation here.

a crowd of people outside of a white building

In a 5-4 split decision, the US Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to disburse nearly $2 billion in foreign aid funds for work completed by contractors and grant recipients under the US Agency for International Development and the State Department. Does this tell us much about how the top court will handle future Trump-related cases?