Mission creep or mission critical?

Ukrainian servicemen drill at the Belarusian border, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine near Chornobyl, Ukraine
Ukrainian servicemen drill at the Belarusian border, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine near Chornobyl, Ukraine
REUTERS/Viacheslav Ratynskyi

Get ready for the coming American debate over US support for Ukraine.

For now, Americans have Ukraine’s back. In an exclusive new poll conducted by Maru Public Opinion for GZERO, more than three-quarters of respondents say they want the US to remain "involved" in the war, with the majority favoring the supply of weapons and money to help that country repel Russia’s invasion.

But as the newly restored Republican majority in the House of Representatives builds its political agenda, and as GOP presidential candidates look for lines of attack on the Democratic incumbent, we’ll hear more Republicans argue that active support for Ukraine is a prohibitively expensive Biden administration policy. Some Republican lawmakers have already threatened to block further funding. Your GZERO Daily team will be watching these poll numbers in coming months to see just how polarizing this policy becomes.

In particular, more Republicans will warn that President Joe Biden is leaving the United States vulnerable to “mission creep,” the risk that any government can lose control of its own policy as war takes on its own logic. The American taxpayer, they’ll say, has already paid too high a price as Biden deepens his commitment to an increasingly dangerous war with a nuclear-armed enemy.

Here are the best arguments on each side of this coming debate.

Mission Creep

  • President Biden is involving the US in a war against a hostile nuclear power to protect a country that’s not a member of NATO and isn’t relevant to US national security. Accidental spillover of this war beyond Ukraine’s borders could suck the US into the riskiest military confrontation in its history.
  • Russia doesn’t threaten the US in any important way. Why is this conflict any of our business?
  • Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky asked for tanks. When he got them, he immediately asked for fighter jets. What will he ask for next? How many tens of billions of dollars should US taxpayers spend on this war? In tough economic times, let them keep that hard-earned money in their pocket.
  • Is there a rigorous process for determining what Ukraine actually needs? Our own Ian Bremmer, who broadly supports US military backing for Ukraine, has cast doubt on that question. The Biden folks dragged their heels on providing Abrams tanks with arguments they might prove more trouble than they’re worth on this particular battlefield. Then they agreed to send them anyway. What changed?
  • Biden has said the US won’t send weapons that Ukrainians could use to attack Russian territory … but then announced this week it will send longer-range artillery and ammunition, though not long-range missiles. Why should Americans have confidence these escalations are carefully thought through?
  • Ukraine is a famously corrupt country. How much US aid will be stolen or wasted?
  • The risk: The more you invest, the more reason you have to ensure your investment is successful … which in this case means still more investment. When and how does it end?

Mission Critical

We’ll then hear pushback against these arguments from Biden, from Democrats generally, and from hawkish Republicans.

  • Russia is a threat to the US and the security of its European allies. If Vladimir Putin takes Ukraine, he’ll want more. He’ll restore the constant threat to NATO and Western democracies we thought had ended with Soviet implosion in 1991.
  • If Ukrainians have the guts to fight a nuclear-armed invader to protect their independence and democracy, shouldn’t those who preach to the world about Western values make a real contribution to defend them? This isn’t a civil war or a complex multi-sided conflict. It’s Putin’s full, frontal assault on international rule of law. Put up or shut up!
  • The world is watching, and a precedent is being set. Putin apparently believed his bold invasion would force a quick Ukrainian surrender and present the West with a fait accompli. If the West backs off in coming months, and Russia ultimately wins this war, what message will this retreat send to those who believe borders can still be redrawn at gunpoint. Both China and Taiwan would like to know.

The two arguments aren’t mutually exclusive. Yes, time is of the essence on the battlefield, but US and European leaders can still scale their commitment to ensure Russia can’t win, work to limit the risk that an accident can force a dangerous escalation, and manage the process in a cost-conscious way.

Or can they?

Tell us what you think. Is expanding US military support for Ukraine a case of mission creep or mission critical?

More from GZERO Media

Colombian President Gustavo Petro speaks during his visit and after a binational council of ministers, in Jacmel, Haiti, on Jan. 22, 2025.
REUTERS/Marckinson Pierre

President Donald Trump ordered a suite of tariffs and visa revocations against Colombian government officials on Sunday after Bogota refused to accept two US military planes carrying deported migrants – and was met with threats of retaliatory tariffs by Colombian President Gustavo Petro.

Residents of south Lebanon, who were displaced during the war, tried to return to their villages still occupied by Israel despite the expiration of the 60-day ceasefire implementation period. These Lebanese Muslim Shiite women inspect their destroyed house in the southern Lebanese border village of Ayta ash-Shaab after returning to their devastated hamlet.

Marwan Naamani/dpa via Reuters Connect

Hostilities continued on Sunday in southern Lebanon, where more than 22 Lebanese civilians were killed and over 124 wounded by Israeli forces, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry.

Internally displaced civilians from the camps in Munigi and Kibati carry their belongings as they flee following the fight between M23 rebels and the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo, on Jan. 26, 2025.
REUTERS/Aubin Mukoni

Rwandan-backed M23 rebels are closing in on Goma, the largest city in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo, after killing a Congolese military governor who was visiting the area on Thursday. Flights are grounded, roads are blocked, and there is “mass panic and flight among the population” of one million people, according to UN special representative for Congo Bintou Keita.

Marco Rubio speaks after he is sworn in as Secretary of State by U.S. Vice President JD Vance at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, on Jan. 21, 2025.

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio clashed with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in their first phone call on Friday over the independence of Taiwan. Will this set a bad early tone for US-China relations under President Donald Trump?

- YouTube

The shifting geopolitical landscape and uncertainty surrounding the future of AI have stirred anxiety among those gathered in Davos. Yet, there are glimmers of hope. “The most important thing for me is really to turn the anxiety into action," said Teresa Hutson, Corporate Vice President of Microsoft.

Migrants line up to leave the United States for Mexico after being deported across the Paso del Norte international border bridge after President Donald Trump promised mass deportation operation, as seen from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on Jan. 23, 2025.
REUTERS/Jose Luis Gonzalez

As Donald Trump begins to roll out his plans for the “largest deportation operation in history,” Mexico, the country with the highest number of unauthorized citizens living in the US — some 4 million people — is preparing to welcome back thousands of deportees. Mexico plans to send anyone from elsewhere back to their home countries.

President Donald Trump attends a bilateral meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

During his first week in office, Donald Trump took steps to withdraw the US from two major international commitments: the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization. Will this create opportunities for other global powers, not least China, to fill the void?