Publishers are cashing in on AI

OpenAI logo displayed on a phone screen and binary code displayed on a laptop screen are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on December 5, 2022.
OpenAI logo displayed on a phone screen and binary code displayed on a laptop screen are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on December 5, 2022.
Jakub Porzycki/Reuters

OpenAI is striking lucrative deals with major news publishers to license their content for their AI models. On May 29, OpenAI announcedthat it struck deals with The Atlantic and Vox Media one week after it inked a similar agreement with Wall Street Journal publisher News Corp. While the News Corp. deal was reportedly worth $250 million over five years, figures for the new deals haven’t yet been reported.

There’s currently a split in the news world over how to deal with tech companies that want news content to train their models and deliver reliable, up-to-date information for users. The New York Times has taken a different approach and is suing OpenAI for copyright violations, as have several newspapers owned by Alden Global Capital.

Journalists have also pushed back against coziness with AI firms. Jessica Lessin, founder of the news site The Information, wrote an op-ed in The Atlantic just days before the deal was announced, saying that news companies are making a “huge mistake” by “absolving AI companies of theft.”

The Atlantic’s tech editor, Damon Beres, called it a “devil’s bargain” in writing about his employer. “Generative AI has not exactly felt like a friend to the news industry, given that it is trained on loads of material without permission from those who made it in the first place,” Beres wrote, likening these deals to the ones made with Facebook and other social media companies a decade ago — only for them to change their mind and pivot away from news.

Vox’s Editorial Director Bryan Walsh also wrote critically about his employer: “I’ve seen our industry pin our hopes on search engine optimization; on the pivot to video (and back again); on Facebook and social media traffic,” he wrote. “But sure — maybe this time Lucy won’t pull the football away.”

More from GZERO Media

A house burns as powerful winds fueling devastating wildfires in the Los Angeles area force people to evacuate, in Altadena, California, on Jan. 8, 2025.

REUTERS/David Swanson

As wildfires scorched Los Angeles for a second day on Wednesday, hurricane-strength winds and limited water supplies complicated efforts to contain the flames.

Kurdish fighters from the People's Protection Units (YPG) take part in a military parade as they celebrate victory over the Islamic state, in Qamishli, Syria March 28, 2019.
REUTERS/Rodi Said

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan threatened this week to launch attacks against Kurdish-led forces in northeastern Syria.

A ballot box is displayed inside the parliament building, a day ahead of Lebanon's parliament's attempt to elect a new head of state in downtown Beirut, Lebanon, January 8, 2025.
REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

The crisis-wracked country needs a stable government in order to secure aid.

Listen: It's officially the new year, and 2025 will bring a whole new set of challenges as governments react to the shifting policies of the incoming Trump administration, instability in the Middle East, China’s economic weakness, and a world where the global order feels increasingly tenuous. 2025 will be a year of heightened geopolitical risks and global disorder, with the world no longer aligned with the balance of power. So what should we be paying attention to, and what’s the world’s #1 concern for the year ahead? Ian Bremmer analyzes the Eurasia Group's Top Risks of 2025 report with a panel of global experts.

Donald Trump faces reporters in the Oval Office on Sept. 11, 2020.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

President-elect Donald Trump is doubling down on threats that the US should take control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, and he isn’t ruling out the use of force to accomplish this. He's also taking swipes at Canada. But the relevant foreign leaders are having none of it.

Annie Gugliotta

We are heading back to the law of the jungle – where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must. This is the G-Zero world I’ve been warning about for over a decade now – an era when no one power or group of powers is both willing and able to drive a global agenda and maintain international order.