Russia and Saudi Arabia play a crude game of chicken

For three years, Russia and Saudi Arabia, the world's two largest oil exporters, had a deal to prop up global crude prices by limiting production. They calculated that by producing fewer barrels, rising prices would make each barrel worth more.

Over the weekend, that deal collapsed when Russia backed out, allegedly because it decided that higher prices were also providing an unexpectedly large boost for the US oil industry, which has expanded its market share by increasing production by nearly 50 percent since the Russia-Saudi (formally, Russia-OPEC) deal began in late 2016. A lot of that increase has come from US shale oil.

Saudi Arabia, eager to show Russia that its market power is not to be ignored, slashed the price at which it sells its own oil, and moved to sharply boost production. The expected flood of new Saudi supply dropped global oil prices by more than 30 percent on Monday, the biggest overnight drop in almost three decades. Stock markets, already wobbly thanks to coronavirus, took a dive.

Now Moscow and Riyadh appear locked in a price war – a crude game of chicken that could last for weeks or even months. Oil markets are reeling because this conflict comes just as the coronavirus clobbers demand for oil as factories close, and as international shipping and air travel slow dramatically. More supply + less demand = price collapse.

Here's how the key players in this oil price drama are looking at this:

Saudi Arabia: Bring it on. If Russia won't play ball, Riyadh is happy to make them suffer lower prices, and if that also makes it unprofitable for American shale oil producers to get their stuff out of the ground, so much the better. By dint of geology, it costs the Saudis less to produce a barrel of oil than other major producers, so they can weather lower prices, at least for a while. But if this goes on too long, government revenues will suffer, and the Crown Prince will have less money to pour into his grand plan to develop the non-oil parts of the Saudi economy.

Russia: That escalated quickly. It's possible that Putin miscalculated by pulling out of the deal, not expecting such a swift and severe Saudi response. Russia can take the price hit for a good while – it has nearly $600 billion in reserves, including a $150 billion rainy day fund, and its budget is far less oil-dependent than it used to be. But a prolonged period of oil at $20-$30 per barrel would inflict some serious pain that Putin, powerful though he is, probably wants to avoid, if only to keep from running down his financial safety cushions too much.

The United States: Good for some, bad for others. On the one hand, low oil prices mean gasoline and other consumer goods get cheaper. On the other, oil companies make up a big chunk of the main stock indices, and those scrappy shale oil producers that have boosted US production in recent years are carrying a lot of corporate debt. If lower prices push them into insolvency, there is a risk of a severe financial contagion – right as the coronavirus also hits the US economy.

Other oil producing countries: This is bad. This is very bad. The price dive is frightening for major exporters like Nigeria and Mexico, which are struggling to find the money to fund big policy promises, and especially for Venezuela and Iran, which already have economic crises (as well as US sanctions) to manage.

Oil importing countries: The best thing at the worst time. If you are India or China or Turkey, all of which depend hugely on oil imports, you love lower oil prices. If only you didn't also have to worry about coronavirus, financial contagion, or wars and migrant crises.

Bottom of the oil well: Much depends on how long the Russia-Saudi fight goes on. It's possible that Saudi Arabia's big weekend move will bring Russia quickly back to the table for a new deal. If not, we could be in for a prolonged price war. That will inflict significant pain even on Saudi Arabia and Russia, but Vladimir Putin and Mohamed bin Salman are not exactly known for their willingness to back down from a fight.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says AI can be both a force for good and a tool for harm. “AI has either the possibility of…providing interventions and disruption, or it has the ability to also further harms, increase radicalization, and exacerbate issues of terrorism and extremism online.”

Demonstrators carry the dead body of a man killed during a protest a day after a general election marred by violent demonstrations over the exclusion of two leading opposition candidates at the Namanga One-Post Border crossing point between Kenya and Tanzania, as seen from Namanga, Kenya October 30, 2025.
REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya

Tanzania has been rocked by violence for three days now, following a national election earlier this week. Protestors are angry over the banning of candidates and detention of opposition leaders by President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

Illegal immigrants from Ethiopia walk on a road near the town of Taojourah February 23, 2015. The area, described by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as one of the most inhospitable areas in the world, is on a transit route for thousands of immigrants every year from Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia travelling via Yemen to Saudi Arabia in hope of work. Picture taken February 23.
REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic

7,500: The Trump administration will cap the number of refugees that the US will admit over the next year to 7,500. The previous limit, set by former President Joe Biden, was 125,000. The new cap is a record low. White South Africans will have priority access.

- YouTube

In an era characterized by rapid technological advancement, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence present both challenges and opportunities. At the 2025 Paris Peace Forum, GZERO’s Tony Maciulis engages in an insightful conversation with Dame Jacinda Ardern, former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and Lisa Monaco, President of Global Affairs at Microsoft, discussing strategies for a secure digital future.

- YouTube

As AI adoption accelerates globally, questions of equity and access are coming to the forefront. Speaking with GZERO’s Tony Maciulis on the sidelines of the 2025 Paris Peace Forum, Chris Sharrock, Vice President of UN Affairs and International Organizations at Microsoft, discusses the role of technology in addressing global challenges.