Russia’s war heads for a deep freeze

Russia’s war heads for a deep freeze. Putin attends a meeting with the head of the Republic of Ingushetia at the Kremlin in Moscow
Putin attends a meeting with the head of the Republic of Ingushetia at the Kremlin in Moscow.
Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via REUTERS

Who will win Russia’s war in Ukraine? What might a peace deal look like? The sad truth is that true victory may elude both sides, and there is no foreseeable basis for a lasting peace agreement.

The likeliest outcome in Ukraine is “an unstable, violent stalemate,” according to political risk consultancy Eurasia Group, one that creates future risks for Ukraine, Russia, and the world.

Here’s why ...

First, Ukraine’s leaders aren’t ready to compromise because they think they can deny Russia a military victory. Russia’s failure (so far) to seize control of Kyiv and other major Ukrainian cities boosts their confidence, and Russia’s stated shift in strategy to grab and hold more territory in Ukraine’s east and south looks like a Russian retreat. Ukraine’s most battle-tested troops are already fighting in those areas, and more useful weapons are arriving from backers beyond their borders.

Russia isn’t ready to compromise either. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said this week that the alliance expects “a further Russian push in eastern and southern Ukraine to try to take the entire Donbas and to create a land bridge to occupied Crimea.” Russia’s leaders still expect to “liberate” this territory so President Vladimir Putin can say he’s halted the (fictional) genocide he claims Ukrainian soldiers have committed against Russian-speaking civilians in the Donbas since 2014. This is a priority goal: having backed off Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, Russia must win something that looks like a victory if Putin and the Russian army are to avoid a historic humiliation.

Second, even if the two sides continue to talk about peace, there isn’t enough common ground for a deal that anyone can expect to last. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky won’t offer major concessions without a security guarantee for his country, even if that guarantee doesn’t include NATO membership. For its part, Russia has no reason to accept a future that includes Ukraine, now Russia’s sworn enemy, having guaranteed protection from other countries. And those countries have little reason to write a long-term blank check to back Ukraine unconditionally in a war that could erupt again at any time.

The implications

The near-term outcome of the fighting in Ukraine remains uncertain. Neither side has a clear advantage, even as Russia appears to shift toward less ambitious goals. But unless Russia can destroy Ukraine’s army or Ukraine can drive Russian forces out completely – both unlikely outcomes – the fighting will freeze as an unstable military stalemate takes hold.

Without a peace agreement that can last, Ukraine (and outsiders) know that Putin could launch another war at any time. That would leave foreign investors reluctant to finance the reconstruction of a Ukraine that Russia might ravage again, the US unwilling to lift sanctions on Russia, and European governments doubly determined to relieve their dangerous dependence on Russian energy supplies ahead of a future conflict. Russia’s economy will slowly sink, and its most talented people will head for the lifeboats.

There are two wildcards to consider, one near term and one longer term. According to Eurasia Group, Russia will probably succeed in taking the Donbas, but it’s a “close call.” If, on the other hand, Ukrainian fighters can deny Russians control of the region central to Putin’s original justification for the invasion, there is a “significant risk that [Russia] could use chemical weapons” to reverse its military fortunes, according to its research. Such a decision is a gamble, but Putin has already rolled the dice in Ukraine, and risking a humiliating defeat could prove a serious threat to Putin himself.

Longer term, even if the conflict in Ukraine remains frozen, Putin’s inability to bring Ukraine fully under his control may encourage him to use other sorts of weapons against Americans and Europeans. Cyberspace is an arena in which Russia and the West are already in open conflict. President Joe Biden warned on March 21 that cyberattacks are “part of Russia’s playbook” and “the Russian Government is exploring options for potential cyberattacks.”

That’s why an unresolved conflict in Ukraine creates risks that extend far beyond Ukraine’s borders.

Willis Sparks is a senior Global Macro political risk analyst at Eurasia Group. GZERO Media is a subsidiary of Eurasia Group.

More from GZERO Media

Listen: On the GZERO World Podcast, we’re taking a look at some of the top geopolitical risks of 2025. This looks to be the year that the G-Zero wins. We’ve been living with this lack of international leadership for nearly a decade now. But in 2025, the problem will get a lot worse. We are heading back to the law of the jungle. A world where the strongest do what they can while the weakest are condemned to suffer what they must. Joining Ian Bremmer to peer into this cloudy crystal ball is renowned Stanford political scientist Francis Fukuyama.

President-elect Donald Trump appears remotely for a sentencing hearing in front of New York State Judge Juan Merchan in his hush money case at New York Criminal Court in New York City, on Jan. 10, 2025.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/Pool

President-elect Donald Trump was sentenced in his New York hush money case on Friday but received no punishment from Judge Juan M. Merchan, who issued an unconditional discharge with no jail time, probation, or fines

Paige Fusco

In a way, Donald Trump’s return means Putin has finally won. Not because of the silly notion that Trump is a “Russian agent” – but because it closes the door finally and fully on the era of post-Cold War triumphalist globalism that Putin encountered when he first came to power.

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado greets supporters at a protest ahead of the Friday inauguration of President Nicolas Maduro for his third term, in Caracas, Venezuela January 9, 2025.
REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria

Regime forces violently detained Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado as she left a rally in Caracas on Thursday, one day before strongman President Nicolás Maduro was set to begin his third term.

Paige Fusco

Justin Trudeau is leaving you, Donald Trump is coming for you. The timing couldn’t be worse. The threat couldn’t be bigger. The solutions couldn’t be more elusive, writes GZERO Publisher Evan Solomon.

- YouTube

Is international order on the precipice of collapse? 2025 is poised to be a turbulent year for the geopolitical landscape. From Canada and South Korea to Japan and Germany, the world faces a “deepening and rare absence of global leadership with more chaos than any time since the 1930s,” says Eurasia Group chairman Cliff Kupchan during a GZERO livestream to discuss the 2025 Top Risks report.

During the Munich Security Conference 2025, the BMW Foundation will again host the BMW Foundation Herbert Quandt Pavilion. From February 13th to 15th, we will organize panels, keynotes, and discussions focusing on achieving energy security and economic prosperity through innovation, policy, and global cooperation. The BMW Foundation emphasizes the importance of science-based approaches and believes that the energy transition can serve as a catalyst for economic opportunity, sustainability, and democratic resilience. Our aim is to facilitate solution-oriented dialogues between business, policy, science, and civil society to enhance Europe’s competitiveness in the energy and technology sectors, build a strong economy, and support a future-proof society. Read more about the BMW Foundation and our Pavilion at the Munich Security Conference here.