The US Finally Has An Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Sort of)

This week, President Trump signed an executive order directing the US government to come up with a plan to sharpen America's edge in artificial intelligence. It's the closest Washington has come to laying out a national strategy for AI since Trump took office, and comes nearly two years after Beijing's central planners unveiled their ambitious plan to turn China in to the world leader in AI by 2030.

Here's a quick primer on how to think about the emerging US approach to a field that will shape the global balance of power in coming decades.


The private sector is in the driver's seat

The US and China both increasingly see success in AI as a national imperative, but to the extent that the countries are in a "race" to master AI, it's one between Silicon Valley and China's highly capable tech companies – not governments. Policies that flow from Washington and Beijing will play an important role in shaping how the AI revolution pans out, but government plans and the actual innovation needed to get there are two different things.

The emerging US strategy: play defense

For decades, the US's national technology strategy has been one of benign neglect: keep the government out of the way and reap the benefits of private sector innovation. But that's now changing under pressure from an increasingly influential contingent of national security hawks. They're worried that if China catches up to or surpasses the US in AI or other key technology fields, it could blunt US military superiority and dull America's economic edge.

While Trump's executive order calls on federal agencies to come up with new ways to boost the AI sector in the US, such as making more federal data available for training AI algorithms and prioritizing AI in government R&D funding, the main thrust of the strategy is defensive. The order is focused on protecting America's AI advantage rather than using public resources to develop new technologies. If the ongoing trade war and recent legal actionsagainst Huawei are any guide, that could mean policies that make it harder for Chinese students to study in the US, or other efforts to limit Chinese access to US technologies – like semiconductors – that are key to making progress in AI.

The risk? In a word, overreach. President Trump wants to protect American innovation, but there's a danger that the US ends up shooting itself in the foot by cutting off the cross-border flows of capital, talent, and knowhow that Silicon Valley has historically tapped to make new breakthroughs.

More from GZERO Media

US Capitol building at in the morning sun. Washington DC, USA The US Capitol building in the early morning at sunrise.

While eyes around the globe will be on the US presidency this Election Day, there are consequential races further down the ballot that will determine how much power Kamala Harris or Donald Trump will wield.

Ukrainian service members of the 43rd Hetman Taras Triasylo Separate Artillery Brigade fire towards Russian troops in a Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled howitzer, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, at a position in Donetsk region, Ukraine October 26, 2024.
REUTERS/Viacheslav Ratynskyi

What happens if the Korean People’s Army pushes into Ukraine proper?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant attend a ceremony for the 70th cohort of military combat officers, at an army base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, October 31, 2024.
REUTERS/Amir Cohen

Opposition leader Yair Lapidsays Netanyahu is either complicit or incompetent and, therefore, “not qualified to lead.” Hostage families are also up in arms.

- YouTube

Ian Bremmer's Quick Take: With election week upon us, Americans—and those watching closely—are stressed and anxious. Ian Bremmer explains how the decline of America's political institutions is driving public anxiety and mistrust and has birthed a particularly divisive electoral cycle.