The US is allied to Israel, not Netanyahu

Jess Frampton

A widening rift between US President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the war in Gaza and the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has now spilled into public view.

For starters, the two leaders differ on the timeline, endgame, and conduct of Israel’s military campaign.

On the timeline and endgame of the war, Israel’s war cabinet continues to assert that the Gaza ground operation could drag on not for weeks – as it had initially promised the US – but for months, or however long it takes to ensure the complete destruction of Hamas. Biden’s team is pushing for a prompt transition to a lower intensity, more targeted phase of fighting with less maximalist goals. While Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant signaled yesterday that Israel is prepared to eventually make that transition, he has given no indication of when that will happen – or to what extent Israel’s government will scale down its ambitions.

On the conduct of the war, Israeli officials had privately assured the Biden administration that they had learned from their mistakes in the first weeks of the war – especially the bombing campaign in northern Gaza – and would be more restrained and deliberate in later fighting. But that is not what the Americans have seen since then, as the Palestinian death toll in Gaza has continued to mount. It has become especially hard to argue that there’s been any shift in targeting or restraint in the aftermath of the Israel Defense Forces’ killing of three Israeli hostages flying a white flag, an episode that has shaken the Israeli public’s confidence in its military.

But the divide between Biden and Netanyahu runs deeper.

At the heart of it lies a fundamental disagreement about the role the Palestinian Authority should play in Gaza’s future security and governance and, implicitly, the viability of an eventual two-state solution (however remote). Biden wants the PA to take Hamas’ place once the war is over, while Netanyahu staunchly opposes any PA involvement (even as he refuses to say who else he would prefer to fill the void) – effectively ruling out Palestinian self-rule, let alone a Palestinian state.

Make no mistake: On this, Biden is right and Netanyahu is wrong. And Netanyahu is wrong not because he doesn’t understand the implications of what he’s proposing – the perpetual subjugation of Palestinians, Israel’s international isolation, the constant internal and external security threat not just to Israelis but to Jews worldwide – but because he does.

While there’s no doubt that Israel faces serious risks from Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Tehran-backed militias in Iraq and Syria, none represents an existential danger. Israel can fend them off thanks to its qualitative military edge over its regional rivals – developed with American support – as well as its nuclear deterrent and growing ties with regional partners. Indeed, for all Netanyahu’s doomsaying about existential wipeout, he has also spent the past couple of decades touting Israel as a safe bet for long-term investment. Both contentions cannot simultaneously be true, and Netanyahu knows it. He just has an overriding political and – given his corruption trials – personal interest in pretending otherwise.

American interests, however, lie in supporting Israel’s long-term security and promoting regional and global stability – not in bolstering the political or personal agenda of Israel's leader. Which means that Biden has an obligation to step up and do something no US president has ever done: leverage America’s support for Israel to put pressure on Netanyahu to change course – or, failing that, persuade Israelis to dump Netanyahu and do it themselves.

Some may say that that would be meddling in another country’s affairs, and they’d be correct. But Netanyahu himself has set the precedent for actively campaigning against an ally’s policy that he opposed. If you’ll remember, in 2015 Netanyahu traveled to Washington to publicly torpedo President Barack Obama’s signature Iran nuclear deal before a joint session of Congress. Biden was vice president back then, and he saw firsthand how Netanyahu did everything in his power to undermine the American president’s policy instead of trying to engage with him quietly and in good faith, as an ally should.

Now, Biden should repay the favor and publicly pressure Netanyahu to back down from a strategy that is sure to be counterproductive both for Israel and the United States. That means that Biden must engage far more assertively on the Israeli domestic stage. He should meet with families of hostages, give interviews to Israeli media, and address the Knesset. And he must underscore his and America’s sincere friendship with the Israeli people and nation while pointedly conveying that this sterling partnership does not extend to Netanyahu – especially not when his policies severely damage Israel’s long-term security.

At the end of the day, what the world needs right now is bold US leadership that can end the current bloodshed, bring stability to the region, and salvage any hopes for an (admittedly distant) Israeli-Palestinian peace built on mutual rights and security. That can only be done if Biden is willing to confront Netanyahu more forcefully in the weeks and months ahead. For the sake of Americans. For the sake of Palestinians. And for the sake of Israelis.

More from GZERO Media

Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum holds a press conference in Mexico City, Mexico February 3, 2025.
REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

With hours to spare, President Donald Trump hit the pause button on a North American trade war, reaching agreements with both Mexico and Canada to delay the imposition of 25% tariffs that had businesses and markets sweating. Ten percent tariffs on Chinese products, however, took effect overnight.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa looks on during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2025.
REUTERS/Yves Herman

President Donald Trump has said that he will cut all US funding to South Africa, accusing the government there of confiscating land and “treating certain classes of people very badly,” an allegation South African President Cyril Ramaphosa denies.

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump after signing the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and some of its Middle East neighbors, in Washington DC, in 2020. This week Netanyahu arrives for fresh talks with Trump.
REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Photo

Netanyahu is the first foreign leader to visit Trump 2.0. He arrives arrives at a fraught time for the Middle East.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio tours the Miraflores locks at the Panama Canal in Panama City, Feb. 2, 2025.
Mark Schiefelbein/Pool via REUTERS

The move comes after US top diplomat Marco Rubio visited the Central American country and demanded "immediate changes" at the Panama Canal.

- YouTube

As Trump returns to the White House, European leaders are reassessing their distaste for Trump, as well as their reliance on the US. In a wide-ranging conversation on GZERO World, Ian Bremmer sits with Finnish President Alexander Stubb on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos.