The worst may be yet to come in Russia-Ukraine energy crisis

The worst may be still to come in the Russia-Ukraine energy crisis
A worker turns a valve at a Russian oil field near the Ural Mountains.
REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted fears of a disruption of oil and gas supplies to Europe, sending prices to new highs. Brent crude futures reached $105 per barrel in the immediate aftermath of the news before falling back; European natural gas prices jumped by as much as 25%.

Coming at a time of already tight supplies, the conflict is bound to maintain upward pressure on prices, unless it becomes clear that Russian exports will not be interrupted. The impact will be felt directly by US consumers and others, and it will contribute further to already-high inflation.

Escalating tension over Ukraine had pushed prices up even before the invasion. Fears that Russian natural gas exports through Ukraine were at risk had been an important factor driving record-high prices in Europe, which relies on Russia for over 40% of its natural gas imports. Ukraine had less impact on oil prices, but with demand growth outstripping the increases in supply, markets are wary.

Still, the Russian invasion of Ukraine has not (yet) led to an immediate interruption of oil or natural gas supplies. Trade in Russian oil slowed temporarily in anticipation of US and EU sanctions, but given that the initial US and EU measures put in place did not target energy, crude sales are likely to return to normal.

Natural gas supplies are more vulnerable given that about 20% of Russian gas exports outside of former Soviet Union countries flow through Ukraine. The risk of damage to pipelines will grow as the fighting escalates, and Russia may seek to deny Ukraine transit fees by declaring force majeure to remove Russian liability over gas shipments through this route. Such a move by Russia would have the additional benefit of hitting EU finances as well by raising the cost of alternative supplies to the bloc.

In the longer term, the risk to energy supplies will depend on two factors.

The first is whether tighter sanctions are imposed by the US and the EU. Deeper and wider sanctions are certainly possible, especially if Russia seeks to occupy all or parts of Ukraine. US and EU officials insisted in the run-up to the invasion that they would seek to avoid measures that directly target Russian energy flows, not least because of the damage to their own economies.

But the tougher the financial sanctions that are imposed and the greater the number of Russian banks targeted, the greater the risk that Western companies will balk at conducting business with these financial institutions. This hesitancy could derail transactions in the energy sector and others. At the very least, having to comply with sanctions will make Western banks more reticent to deal with their Russian counterparts.

Oil transactions will probably be affected first, as this trade is largely short-term. But, over time, long-term gas contracts will also be affected.

The second factor is whether Russia retaliates against sanctions by deploying its own "energy weapon”: cutting off oil and gas exports to Europe. It has not threatened such measures so far; on the contrary, Russia’s government and companies were at pains to emphasize their reliability as energy suppliers immediately prior to the invasion, and have raised natural gas flows in the aftermath of military operations. Reversing course now would destroy their credibility in the markets and bring huge financial and commercial costs.

Energy is a major source of revenue for the Kremlin, with oil and natural gas making up 40% of its budget receipts. For big companies such as Gazprom, breaking long-term contracts with the EU risks major legal liability and would further accelerate the bloc's moves to decouple from its dependence on Russian gas.

On the oil side, interrupting physical supplies would force Russian companies to cede market share. If that happens, other producers — particularly OPEC leaders such as Saudi Arabia — would face increasing pressure to use their own spare capacity to fill the gap in Russian supplies.

Nevertheless, the invasion of Ukraine demonstrates that Russian President Vladimir Putin is willing to take large gambles. Therefore, the possibility of a full suspension of oil and natural gas exports to the EU cannot be dismissed. If it does happen, the impact would be devastating, not just to those European economies dependent on Russian imports, but to the wider global economy as well.

Cutting off all natural gas exports to Europe would lead to massive power shortages and sky-high prices that would drive the EU and UK economies into long-term recessions. Meanwhile, a suspension of Russian oil exports to Europe would immediately drive global prices well above $100 per barrel, and spur more global inflation.

It would be a pyrrhic victory victory at best for Russia, given the likely long-term strategic and energy blowback. But in his current mood, Putin may not care.

Raad Alkadiri is managing director for Energy, Climate & Resources at Eurasia Group.

More from GZERO Media

Graphic of exit poll data
Luisa Vieira

The votes are still being tallied following Donald Trump’s win in the US presidential election, but looking at preliminary voter data gives clues to what happened in the American electorate last week.

Palestinians carry an aid box distributed by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Deir Al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, November 4, 2024.
REUTERS/Ramadan Abed

Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he will nominate former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to serve as US ambassador to Israel.

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump and Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) react during a campaign event at Dorton Arena, in Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S. November 4, 2024.
REUTERS/Jonathan Drake

Based on his picks so far, immigration will be at the top of Trump’s agenda as he appears poised to follow through with his campaign promises on this issue.

- YouTube

In a GZERO Global Stage discussion at the 7th annual Paris Peace Forum, Teresa Hutson, Corporate Vice President at Microsoft, reflected on the anticipated impact of generative AI and deepfakes on global elections. Despite widespread concerns, she noted that deepfakes did not significantly alter electoral outcomes. Instead, Hutson highlighted a more subtle effect: the erosion of public trust in online information, a phenomenon she referred to as the "liar's dividend."

Photogrammetry, AI, and digital preservation combine to create a digital twin of St. Peter’s Basilica with over 400,000 images, allowing visitors to explore it in detail from anywhere in the world. La Basilica di San Pietro — a collaboration between the Vatican, Iconem, and Microsoft — gives everyone full access to Vatican City’s most iconic church via AI-enabled immersive exhibits and an interactive website. Learn more about the project and explore the digital twin here.

Proud Source Water became a Walmart supplier in 2021. Today, their team has grown 50%, and they're the largest employer in Mackay, ID. When local suppliers work with Walmart, their business can grow. In fact, two-thirds of Walmart's product spend is on products made, grown, or assembled in America. By working with Walmart, local businesses like Proud Source Water can reach more customers, hire more people, and help their communities thrive. Explore the positive impact of Walmart's $350 billion investment in US manufacturing.

A general view of the German lower house of parliament, in Berlin, Germany.
REUTERS/Lisi Niesner

Under a plan agreed by Chancellor Olaf Scholz and the opposition, Europe’s largest economy is now headed toward early elections in February.