To get closer, the US and China talk nukes

FILE PHOTO: Military vehicles carrying DF-5B liquid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) march past the Tiananmen Rostrum during the military parade to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Beijing, China, 3 September 2015.
FILE PHOTO: Military vehicles carrying DF-5B liquid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) march past the Tiananmen Rostrum during the military parade to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Beijing, China, 3 September 2015.
Oriental Image via Reuters

The National Zoo may have lost its giant pandas, the most iconic symbol of US-China friendship, but breakthroughs in military discussions may help stabilize the relationship. Just ahead of the expected Biden-Xi summit in San Francisco, Beijing and Washington held their first talks on nuclear arms since 2019 and are reportedly planning to announce the resumption of formal military-to-military communications.

The State Department describes the nuclear talks as “constructive,” and China’s Foreign Ministry said they broached the subject of nonproliferation. It’s a subtle but important shift: China has rarely factored into arms control discussions in the past, as Russia and the United States possess nearly 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons. Their bilateral relationship over these apocalyptic arsenals far outweighed any other nuclear state’s position, China included.

Until, that is, Russia decided it wasn’t so interested in arms control anymore. In February, Moscow pulled out of the New START treaty, the last remaining arms control deal with the United States. A dangerous development, given the possibility of escalation in Ukraine, but an intriguing political opportunity for Beijing to augment its international status. After all, if Russia doesn’t want to help set the global rules of the road for nuclear weapons, why shouldn’t China?

From the White House’s perspective, sitting down to talk nukes with Beijing can act as a useful confidence-building measure while also addressing growing security concerns. The Pentagon reports that Beijing has expanded its nuclear arsenal to about 500 warheads, with a target of 1,500 by 2035. That would put China about on par with the US in terms of deployed weapons (counting mothballed warheads, the US arsenal still dwarfs all others except Russia’s) and is reason enough to open dialogue. Axios reports both sides are preparing to announce a formal resumption of military contacts, which were suspended last year after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan, infuriating Beijing.

Russia, for its part, seems to have woken up and smelled the plutonium. After news of the US-China nuclear talks broke, the Kremlin said it remained willing to talk nukes with Washington — but would not tolerate “lecturing.” If the US and China are talking about setting up nuclear non-proliferation agreements between the two of them, Russia has no say over how or where they are applied. In short, Beijing winds up looking like a responsible global leader while Russia looks like a rogue state.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

In this Global Stage panel recorded live in Abu Dhabi, Becky Anderson (CNN) leads a candid discussion on how to close that gap with Brad Smith (Vice Chair & President, Microsoft), Peng Xiao (CEO, G42), Ian Bremmer (President & Founder, Eurasia Group and GZERO Media), and Baroness Joanna Shields (Executive Chair, Responsible AI Future Foundation).

A Palestinian Hamas militant keeps guard as Red Cross personnel head towards an area within the so-called “yellow line” to which Israeli troops withdrew under the ceasefire, as Hamas says it continues to search for the bodies of deceased hostages seized during the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, in Gaza City, on November 2, 2025.
REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
Farmers proceed to their fields for cultivation under Nigerian Army escort while departing Dikwa town in Borno State, Nigeria, on August 27, 2025. Despite the threat of insurgent attacks, farmers in Borno are gradually returning to their farmlands under military escort, often spending limited time on cultivation.
REUTERS/Sodiq Adelakun
US President Donald Trump (sixth from left) and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi (seventh from left) arrive at the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN-73) in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, on October 28, 2025.
Akira Takada / The Yomiuri Shimbun via Reuters Connect

Last Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced that Washington will restart nuclear weapons testing, raising fears that it could end a 33-year moratorium on nuclear-warhead testing.

Behind every scam lies a story — and within every story, a critical lesson. Anatomy of a Scam, takes you inside the world of modern fraud — from investment schemes to impersonation and romance scams. You'll meet the investigators tracking down bad actors and learn about the innovative work being done across the payments ecosystem to protect consumers and businesses alike. Watch the first episode of Mastercard's five-part documentary, 'Anatomy of a Scam,' here.

- YouTube

"We are seeing adversaries act in increasingly sophisticated ways, at a speed and scale often fueled by AI in a way that I haven't seen before.” says Lisa Monaco, President of Global Affairs at Microsoft.

US President Donald Trump has been piling the pressure on Russia and Venezuela in recent weeks. He placed sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil firms and bolstered the country’s military presence around Venezuela – while continuing to bomb ships coming off Venezuela’s shores. But what exactly are Trump’s goals? And can he achieve them? And how are Russia and Venezuela, two of the largest oil producers in the world, responding? GZERO reporters Zac Weisz and Riley Callanan discuss.

- YouTube

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says AI can be both a force for good and a tool for harm. “AI has either the possibility of…providing interventions and disruption, or it has the ability to also further harms, increase radicalization, and exacerbate issues of terrorism and extremism online.”