US-China communications brighten over trade

U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo arrives for a meeting with her Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo arrives for a meeting with her Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao
REUTERS

It's no secret that the US and China aren’t communicating well these days. But Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said that she and her Chinese counterpart, Wang Wentao, made significant strides toward changing that when they met in Beijing on Monday.

Over the past year, the US has used export controls and investment restrictions to deny China access to advanced technology. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan has called export controls the “new strategic asset” for imposing “costs on adversaries” and keeping the US as far ahead as possible in important technologies, but China has condemned them as being part of a new containment strategy.

Raimondo, for her part, is trying to narrow the scope of export controls and investment restrictions, asserting that the majority of US-China trade is unrelated to national security. She is hoping to increase exports of non-national security-related items like agricultural, health and beauty products, and entertainment to China as a result of the meetings.

Ahead of Raimondo’s trip, 27 Chinese companies were removed from a blacklist limiting access to US technology, a signal that Washington wanted this meeting to be about increasing cooperation and de-escalating trade tensions.

The two commerce secretaries committed to taking part in working groups and in information sharing about trade issues, a remarkable improvement in communications.

This progress reflects the importance of the US-China trade relationship to both countries. China is eager to revive international investment amid its economic downturn, and the Biden administration wants to “de-risk” the relationship – maintaining cooperation and communication, and benefiting from China’s gigantic market while keeping key technologies out of Beijing’s hands.

More from GZERO Media

A house burns as powerful winds fueling devastating wildfires in the Los Angeles area force people to evacuate, in Altadena, California, on Jan. 8, 2025.

REUTERS/David Swanson

As wildfires scorched Los Angeles for a second day on Wednesday, hurricane-strength winds and limited water supplies complicated efforts to contain the flames.

Kurdish fighters from the People's Protection Units (YPG) take part in a military parade as they celebrate victory over the Islamic state, in Qamishli, Syria March 28, 2019.
REUTERS/Rodi Said

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan threatened this week to launch attacks against Kurdish-led forces in northeastern Syria.

A ballot box is displayed inside the parliament building, a day ahead of Lebanon's parliament's attempt to elect a new head of state in downtown Beirut, Lebanon, January 8, 2025.
REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

The crisis-wracked country needs a stable government in order to secure aid.

Listen: It's officially the new year, and 2025 will bring a whole new set of challenges as governments react to the shifting policies of the incoming Trump administration, instability in the Middle East, China’s economic weakness, and a world where the global order feels increasingly tenuous. 2025 will be a year of heightened geopolitical risks and global disorder, with the world no longer aligned with the balance of power. So what should we be paying attention to, and what’s the world’s #1 concern for the year ahead? Ian Bremmer analyzes the Eurasia Group's Top Risks of 2025 report with a panel of global experts.

Donald Trump faces reporters in the Oval Office on Sept. 11, 2020.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

President-elect Donald Trump is doubling down on threats that the US should take control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, and he isn’t ruling out the use of force to accomplish this. He's also taking swipes at Canada. But the relevant foreign leaders are having none of it.

Annie Gugliotta

We are heading back to the law of the jungle – where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must. This is the G-Zero world I’ve been warning about for over a decade now – an era when no one power or group of powers is both willing and able to drive a global agenda and maintain international order.