Watching the War: Ukrainians resist, West triggers SWIFT sanctions

Watching the War: Ukrainians resist, West triggers SWIFT sanctions
Destroyed armored personnel carrier on the roadside in Kharkiv, Ukraine.
REUTERS/Vyacheslav Madiyevskyy

Russia vs. Ukraine. The war in Ukraine is escalating, with Russian troops now fighting Ukrainian soldiers in Kharkiv, the country’s second-largest city. Meanwhile, in the battle for the capital, Kyiv, the Ukrainians have so far resisted the Russian onslaught, but the mayor says Russian troops have surrounded the city. While President Vladimir Putin no doubt hoped to declare a swift victory, Ukrainian forces are giving him a run for his money. As former CIA chief David Petraeus told Ian Bremmer: “If [Ukrainian forces and partisan brigades] want to put up resistance, it would be a very difficult situation for the Russians.” Russia has roughly 50,000 troops involved, or two-thirds of its massed forces, but US defense officials warned Sunday that Putin has more combat power up his sleeve.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that he’s accepted an invitation by Belarusian strongman — and Putin ally — President Alexander Lukashenko to hold peace talks “without conditions” at the Belarusian border. Neither Zelensky nor Putin will attend, and it’s hard to see what kind of negotiated settlement both sides could accept: Russia attacked Ukraine unprovoked and clearly has grand territorial aspirations, while Zelensky said just last week he was unwilling to cede sovereign territory to the Russians, and he’s leaving the door open to NATO membership. Depending on how the talks go, Belarus could also send troops into Ukraine as soon as Monday, according to a US intelligence official.

The West vs. Russia. This weekend, the US and its allies further tightened the screws on Russia’s economy. First, they announced they would trigger the (economic) nuclear option of excluding some Russian banks from the SWIFT financial messaging platform, stifling their ability to do business with foreign clients. Second, the allies pledged to block Russian central bank foreign currency reserves held by Western financial institutions — a move that would virtually wipe out more than half of Putin’s $640 billion war chest overnight (the rest is mostly in gold kept in Russia and in yuan held by Chinese banks).

The EU announced on Sunday that it’s taking the unprecedented step of financing the purchase of arms for a country in conflict by pledging to buy weapons for Ukraine. Chancellor Olaf Scholz also reversed a longtime German policy on not supplying deadly weapons to countries at war by agreeing to send Ukraine 1,000 anti-tank weapons and 500 surface-to-air missiles. Scholz also plans to raise Germany’s annual defense spending to 2% of GDP, something US and NATO leadership have been encouraging for years. These are the latest signs that the Russian invasion has resulted in the most unified NATO we’ve seen since the Cold War.

In response, Putin on Sunday ordered the Russian military to put its nuclear forces on “special alert” to counter NATO’s “aggressive statements.” While this doesn’t mean Moscow intends to use nukes in the conflict, the move raises the stakes for miscalculation and allied intervention.

More from GZERO Media

Syrian forces head to Latakia after fighters linked to Syria's ousted leader Bashar Assad mounted a deadly attack on government forces on Thursday, March 6, 2025.

REUTERS/Mahmoud Hassano

Nearly 50 people were killed on Thursday in the deadliest clashes Syria has seen since the overthrow of Bashar Assad. Pro-Assad militants attacked security checkpoints around the western coastal town of Jableh, a stronghold of the former regime.

The Liberian-flagged tanker Ice Energy, chartered by the US government, takes Iranian oil from Iranian-flagged Lana (formerly Pegas) as part of a civil forfeiture action off the shore of Karystos, on the Island of Evia, Greece, in May 2022.
REUTERS/Costas Baltas/File Photo

The Trump administration is reportedly considering a strategy to disrupt Iran’s oil exports by stopping and inspecting Iranian oil tankers at sea. The US would use the Proliferation Security Initiative, established in 2003 to prevent the trafficking of weapons of mass destruction, as a legal justification for the inspections.

Donald Trump issues a proclamation from the Oval Office
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

US presidents don’t typically talk to organizations the US government has labeled terrorist groups, but Donald Trump is not a typical US president.

President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol on March 4, 2025.

Win McNamee/Pool via REUTERS

You didn’t need to sit through all 99 minutes of Trump’s peroration to know that he gave himself an A++ on his first six weeks in office, writes GZERO Publisher Evan Solomon. But if Trump gets to grade himself, maybe it’s time for a more objective report card — one that looks at two criteria: Trump as a dealmaker and Trump as a manager.

The Energy Security Hub at the 2025 Munich Security Conference featured in-depth discussions on energy innovation, security, and market viability. Fatih Birol, IEA executive director, discussed growing global energy demand, especially the rapid rise in electricity outpacing overall growth. He noted electricity demand is projected to increase six times faster than total energy in 10 years, underscoring the need for electrification and grid expansion. As energy systems become decentralized and digitalized, the CEO of E.ON, Leonhard Birnbaum, said: “You’re either fully digitized – or you’re done.” Key takeaways: Energy security requires developing and securing electricity grids Technological openness is a unifying element for getting to net zero Bridge the “Valley of Death” to scale markets New global partnerships will help Europe stay competitive Public acceptance will strengthen democracy You can read the full Executive Summary from the BMW Foundation here.

a crowd of people outside of a white building

In a 5-4 split decision, the US Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to disburse nearly $2 billion in foreign aid funds for work completed by contractors and grant recipients under the US Agency for International Development and the State Department. Does this tell us much about how the top court will handle future Trump-related cases?