Will the Supreme Court decide the 2024 election?

Former U.S. President and Presidential Republican candidate Donald Trump
Former U.S. President and Presidential Republican candidate Donald Trump
REUTERS/Octavio Jones/File Photo

In Michigan, the state Supreme Court dismissed an appeal to bar former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot based on the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment. The decision clashes with the Colorado court’s ruling last week to disqualify Trump from the ballot on the same grounds.

But Michigan’s court simply declined to take up the question of whether Trump is eligible to run in the general election. Punting here allows for future attempts to bar him from the general election ballot if he becomes the Republican nominee.

Michigan’s hesitancy may be because the US Supreme Court will likely take up the Colorado case in the coming weeks. Michigan can leave it to them to answer the big questions that underpin insurrection argument, such as:

  • Can the insurrection clause be used to disqualify a president for actions he took while in office?
  • What Pandora’s Box opens if states can kick presidential candidates off their ballots?
  • What exactly is an insurrection anyway? Etc., etc.

Trump applauded the Michigan court’s decision, posting that the 14th amendment cases are “pathetic gambits to rig the election… like they stole 2020” on Truth Social.

The legal imbroglio entrenches the belief of many Trump supporters that the 2020 election was rigged, and the perception that Democrats are conducting a legal witch hunt to ensure Mr. Trump can’t run again.

Trump’s claims of election fraud is even undermining Republicans’ faith in their own primary. Polls show that less than half of Republican voters feel confident that their votes will be counted accurately in the upcoming GOP primaries.

Like in 2000, it appears the Supreme Court could once again be in a position to determine the trajectory of the presidential election. There are a multitude of shock-wave cases knocking on the Supreme Court’s door. Any of which could determine Trump’s trajectory in the 2024 election.

The Supreme Court is all but guaranteed to take up the Colorado case to prevent the chaos of only 49 out of 50 states’ ballots having the Republican frontrunner on the ballot. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has already announced it will decide the fate of those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6th before June, in a case that will have implications for the stalled insurrection case in the DC courts.

More from GZERO Media

Across America, Walmart is supporting communities by working with small businesses, like beyondGREEN, in San Antonio, TX. Since becoming a Walmart supplier in 2023, the Texas-based company built a new factory and hired over 100 employees. Across the country, Walmart’s $350 billion investment in products made, grown, or assembled in America supports the creation of over 750,000 US jobs. Learn how Walmart’s investment in US manufacturing helps small businesses grow.

Microsoft’s AI for Good Lab, in collaboration with Nobel Prize winner David Baker, Seoul National University Professor Minkyung Baek, MIT Professor Bonnie Berger, and University of Pennsylvania Professor Gregory Bowman, have developed Seq2Symm, an AI model that can predict protein structures 80,000 times faster than previous methods. Understanding these structures is key to breakthroughs in medicine, disease research, and synthetic biology. Seq2Symm’s open-source technology will help scientists accelerate drug discovery, better understand diseases like Alzheimer’s, and develop new bioengineered materials. By making protein research faster and more accessible, Microsoft is helping unlock life’s biggest mysteries. Learn more here.

- YouTube

Why are some countries issuing travel advisories for visiting the United States? How are the political tensions in Netanyahu's government impacting the war with Hamas? Will public outcry over the arrest of Istanbul's mayor lead to major political reforms or shifts within the Turkish government? Ian Bremmer shares his insights on global politics this week on World In :60.

Joachim von Braun, president of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, speaks at the “Risks and Opportunities of AI for Children: A Common Commitment for Safeguarding Children” event.

© Alessia Giuliani/IPA via ZUMA Press via Reuters

In a conference at the Vatican last week, Catholic leaders called for global action to protect children from the dangers of artificial intelligence.

Semiconductor chips are seen on a circuit board of a computer in this illustration.

REUTERS/Florence Lo/Illustration

A coalition of nine European countries is discussing how to accelerate the continent’s chip independence, the group said on Friday.

Midjourney

Just a few short months ago, Silicon Valley seemed to have the artificial intelligence industry in a chokehold. Startups OpenAI and Anthropic blazed the trail on large language models while Google, Meta, Microsoft, and other tech incumbents invested billions to keep up. But when the Chinese startup DeepSeek released its AI models in January, claiming they matched American ones in performance at much cheaper prices to develop, the US lead was suddenly called into question.

- YouTube

Ian Bremmer's Quick Take: A key insight revealed by the Yemen military strike group chat: The entire Trump cabinet is saying we shouldn’t be helping the Europeans, and if we have to then they should be paying for it. It's not collective security, it’s purely transactional security.