Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
What We’re Watching: Moscow’s muscle flex, Bolsonaro’s return, Lasso losing his grip
Russia nabs US journalist
A Wall Street Journal reporter apprehended by Russia’s notorious Federal Security Bureau in the city of Yekaterinburg Thursday has appeared in court in the Russian capital on espionage charges, which the Journal has dismissed as bogus.
Evan Gershkovich, who works out of the Moscow bureau for the New-York based outlet and earlier this week penned a bombshell feature on how sanctions are hurting the Russian economy, was on a reporting trip when he was seen being escorted into an FSB van in scenes reminiscent of the Soviet era. Indeed, he’s the first US journalist to have been arrested by Russian authorities since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. The Committee to Protect Journalists has demanded his immediate and unconditional release.
The Kremlin claims that the 31-year-old reporter was “collecting state secrets” on behalf of the US government. But many analysts say this is likely an attempt by President Vladimir Putin to flex his muscles and gain some leverage amid reports that Russia is stalling in Ukraine, with one US general claiming that ongoing fighting in Bakhmut is a “slaughter-fest” for Moscow.
Putin may be looking to secure some sort of trade deal with the US, like he did last fall when Washington agreed to swap WNBA star Brittney Griner, held in a Russian prison, for Viktor Bout, a Russian citizen and notorious arms dealer held in US custody since 2008. But Griner was held for the lesser offense of possessing a small amount of weed oil. Espionage is a whole other ballgame.
We’ll also be watching to see whether US media outlets now respond by pulling reporters out of Russia. After all, the US State Department has urged all US citizens to leave the country fearing a situation just like this.
Bolsonaro back in Brazil
Brazil’s far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro ended his self-imposed exile in Florida on Thursday, returning home to lead the opposition against his archenemy, leftist President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva. After losing the election to Lula last autumn, he never conceded and skipped town instead of attending the inauguration. Lula was confirmed on New Year’s Day, and a week later Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in the capital in Brazil’s own Jan. 6.
Lula must now decide whether to try to put Bolsonaro behind bars or ban him from politics — both of which could backfire because the former president remains hugely popular among his base. He should know: Lula was imprisoned for corruption in 2018, only to retake the presidency a few years later. Bolsonaro faces a litany of investigations, and while his advisors downplay the risk of him being jailed, the threat of legal action could mobilize his fans.
Bolsonaro’s return comes at a tricky time for Lula. While his approval ratings are higher than Bolsonaro’s, Lula campaigned on eradicating poverty but is struggling to pull the country out of an economic slump. He’s also been tussling with the central bank over high-interest rates, which he says is hurting the poor.
Will Lasso get lassoed?
Ecuador's constitutional court has given the go-ahead for parliament to pursue impeachment proceedings against President Guillermo Lasso over his brother-in-law’s alleged involvement in corruption and drug trafficking. This is only the first step in the process, but once it gets to the legislature, Lasso is in serious trouble: He's widely unpopular, and the opposition likely has enough votes to oust him.
If that happens, there are three possible scenarios. First, the conservative Lasso could step down and call a snap election, with the left-wing party of former President Rafael Correa a clear favorite. The embattled president could also let VP Alfredo Borrero take over, although he’d struggle to finish Lasso's term without making big political concessions and spending money Ecuador can't afford.
But the most likely — and dangerous — option is that Lasso challenges his removal by dissolving parliament before he’s impeached and rules by decree until a fresh election, as the Andean nation's constitution allows him to do. That outcome would trigger "chaos on the streets and maybe even a constitutional crisis," says Eurasia Group analyst Risa Grais-Targow.
What We’re Watching: Nigeria’s dwindling cash/patience, Bolsonaro’s next move, China's diplomatic European tour, Armenia’s olive branch
Nigeria’s currency crisis
It’s a little over a week before voters head to the polls in Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, and temperatures on the streets are rising amid protests over a cash shortage. In November, outgoing President Muhammadu Buhari began a program of phasing out currencies of high denominations, saying it would help transition the country to a cashless economy and clamp down on the currency black market and inflation. The timing appears odd so close to an election, but Buhari’s explanation has been that the measure will curb vote buying. But fast forward three months, and banks are running low on cash, with people having to line up for hours to withdraw their own savings. After being told by the government to hand in large denomination notes in exchange for new wads of cash, many are being sent home empty-handed. This is particularly problematic because the West African country of more than 213 million is highly reliant on cash, with just 45% having access to a bank account in 2021. Violence is on the rise as frustrated Nigerians take to the streets, which presents increasing governance challenges ahead of the crucial Feb. 25 vote. In a bid to calm things down, Buhari announced Thursday that one of the three banknotes being phased out would remain legal for another two months. For more on what’s at stake, see this Q+A with Eurasia Group’s Africa expert Amaka Anku.
Bolsonaro plans to return home
The famous Brazilian singer Tom Jobim once said, in so many words, living abroad is great, but it’s crap – living in Brazil is crap, but it’s great. Brazil’s right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro seems to agree: After months of self-imposed exile in South Florida, he reportedly plans to return to Brazil in March to lead the opposition against his nemesis, left-wing President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva. Bolsonaro has been a “Florida Man” since December, after losing to Lula in a presidential election he and his supporters believe was stacked against them. Although Bolsonaro is still hugely popular in Brazil — he lost by less than 2 points — returning is risky. Brazil’s Supreme Court is already investigating his role in the January 8 riots, when thousands of Bolsonaristas ransacked government buildings in the capital, Brasilia. When Bolsonaro arrives, Lula will have a big decision to make. With things as polarized as they are, jailing Bolsonaro or banning him from politics could backfire. Who would know that better than Lula himself? He was imprisoned for corruption in 2018, only to walk free a year later and storm his way back to the presidency.
Beijing’s balancing act
Former Foreign Minister Wang Yi, a chief foreign policy advisor to President Xi Jinping, is on a whirlwind trip to Europe, where he aims to bolster economic ties. On Wednesday, he met with Emmanuel Macron, reportedly asking the French president for help in getting the US to rein in efforts to clamp down on China’s tech sector (the US recently recruited Japan and the Netherlands to join tech export controls on China). Wang is also making stops in Italy, Hungary, and finally Germany, where he’ll attend the Munich Security Conference. Relations between China and the US, as well as much of the EU, have been strained in recent months – to put it mildly. But with Beijing’s economy in decline after years of self-imposed zero-COVID chaos, Beijing is looking for friends with deep pockets wherever it can find them. This might also explain why Wang is reportedly hoping to meet with US Sec. of State Antony Blinken on the sidelines of Munich. If it happens, it’ll come just a few weeks after Blinken’s planned visit to Beijing was canceled after a Chinese spy balloon was identified – and subsequently shot down – over US airspace. EU leaders, meanwhile, are unlikely to acquiesce to China unless Beijing starts distancing itself from Russia’s aggression in Ukraine.
Armenia offers Azerbaijan a peace plan project
The search for peace in Nagorno-Karabakh continues. Armenia has presented Azerbaijan with a project it hopes will achieve lasting peace in the Caucasus region, which the two former Soviet Republics have fought two wars over since the dissolution of the USSR, killing thousands. The most recent one in 2020 ended with a Russia-brokered peace deal, but clashes late last year threatened to unravel both the ceasefire and repeated efforts at a permanent resolution to the conflict. The Armenian plan outlines monitoring mechanisms by both countries to prevent breaches of a peace deal. The region is claimed by Azerbaijan but has a majority Armenian population that has been semiautonomous since the early 1990s and enjoys close relations with nearby Armenia. Complicating matters further, Turkey supports Azerbaijan while Russia is committed to defending Armenia in case of military escalation in a region rich in oil and gas. We’ll be watching to see how Azerbaijan responds and whether the two sides can come to an agreement on ending the long-simmering conflict.Are the men in uniform hurting Brazil's democracy?
Hardcore supporters of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro ransacked Brazil's democratic institutions à la Jan. 6 on Sunday, and there’s strong anecdotal evidence that some members of the security forces didn’t do much to stop them.
It was, at a minimum, a dereliction of duty. Or perhaps it reflected their thinly veiled sympathy for what the protesters were trying to do: overturn the result of the 2022 election to reinstate Bolsonaro.
Local media spotted civilian cops and members of the military police in Brasília chatting with protesters and even escorting them as they stormed parliament, the presidential palace, and the Supreme Court. Ibaneis Rocha, the pro-Bolsonaro governor of the federal district, was suspended for 90 days for failing to prevent the attacks carried out by Bolsonaristas who reportedly arrived in Brasília days before in 100 buses that went unnoticed by the friendly men in uniform. And guess who decided to skip town and is apparently hiding in Florida? Anderson Torres, the capital’s now-fired security chief and Bolsonaro’s former justice minister.
In the end, no security personnel defied the federal order to retake the buildings. Still, the dramatic events have shone a spotlight on Brazil’s capital and on the close ties between the country’s security apparatus and Bolsonaro.
It’s unclear how widespread the phenomenon is. Brazil’s military and police don’t do surveys on the politics of its rank and file. But again, anecdotally, it’s an open secret that most of them are fans of the former president, an ex-army captain himself.
On the one hand, the military is traditionally conservative and thus ideologically aligned with a right-winger like Bolsonaro. On the other, its members have a strong incentive to respect hierarchy and to defend law and order. In that sense, they are not an immediate threat to democracy, says Chris Garman, managing director for the Americas at Eurasia Group.
Brazil's security apparatus, he explains, has strong survival instincts — in part due to lessons learned coming out of military rule in 1985. Very few of its members openly expressed any willingness to support Bolsonaro's efforts to overturn the election result or to defy orders by their commanders despite rumblings of a coup.
Yet, that's not the only risk — especially under the newly minted left-wing presidency of Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva.
"It's more of a gray zone," Garman says. Bolsonarista cops and soldiers might be less aggressive in clamping down on protests that might turn violent, as they've done with thousands of pro-Bolsonaro crowds that have been stirring up trouble across the country since their idol lost re-election to Lula two months ago.
The slow-burn threat is that the crackdown against the rioters and their backers deepens their mistrust of the government and disenchantment with the political class.
A big chunk of Bolsonaro's base — including many members of Brazil’s security apparatus — "came out of this election feeling that [it] was stolen in the loose sense of the word, not the narrow sense of the word from fraud," Garman says. "They view that establishment was out to undermine Bolsonaro and elect Lula" by stacking the odds against the former.
So what, if anything, can Lula do to prevent another 8 de Janeiro? With an Erdogan-style purge of the military and police out of the question, it all comes down to how the prosecution is handled.
For Garman, Lula will have to strike a tough balance between taking effective action against the perpetrators and making sure his measures don't smack of overreach that pushes Bolsonaristas so far into their corner that next time, the security men might be even less inclined to do their job.
Bolsonaro is inciting a 'January 6'-style insurrection in Brazil. It won't work
September 7 marked Brazil’s Independence Day, and President Jair Bolsonaro celebrated in decidedly Trumpian fashion: by railing against the deep state, proclaiming himself the only possible legitimate leader of the country, and inciting violence against his political opponents.
Jair Bolsonaro waves to supporters at September 7 rally. (Andre Borges/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Hundreds of thousands of Brazilians across the country took to the streets on Tuesday, after Bolsonaro summoned his supporters to arm themselves (the president recently said “everyone should buy rifles”) and defend his administration and the country’s “liberty” from institutions like the Supreme Court, which he claims is hostile to his agenda. The demonstrations came in the wake of a series of threats issued by the president, who has warned of an “institutional rupture” if Supreme Court judges fail to heed his “ultimatum” to cease their oversight of, and alleged opposition to, his administration.
Turnout was large by historical standards but smaller than expected, with an estimated 125,000 rallying in support of the president in Sao Paulo alone. Taking the stage in Brasilia and Sao Paulo, Bolsonaro declared all-out war on the high court, urging the Senate to impeach Justice Alexandre de Moraes and ominously warning that the court could “suffer what we don’t want” if it doesn’t toe the line. The demonstrations were largely free of violence, aside from an incident on Monday night when the police used tear gas to repel Bolsonaro backers who had overrun blockades guarding government buildings.
What’s going on?
Yesterday’s demonstrations foreshadow the potential of January 6-like violence in the run-up of Brazil’s presidential election next year—but on a much larger scale. Brazil is the fourth largest democracy in the world, so this will be the most consequential—and troubled—national election anywhere in 2022.
Bolsonaro’s popularity is currently at its lowest since taking office. His approval ratings have plummeted from around 50% to under 30%, owing to his mishandling of COVID-19, a deteriorating economic outlook, an energy crisis, and a series of corruption scandals.
Bolsonaro's approval ratings in declineIbope, XP/Ipespe
His opponent is his biggest nemesis, former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (aka Lula), a popular leftist who was recently freed from prison after serving 2 years on a now-overturned graft conviction. Recent polls show Bolsonaro trailing Lula by as much as 25 percentage points in a head-to-head match-up. One could hardly imagine two more opposite candidates.
Following months of less-than-subtle subtle attempts to undermine trust in the electoral system, Bolsonaro made his most explicit pronouncement last week: he will either win the 2022 election, or he will be arrested or killed. Losing is out of the question. Inconceivable. That is, unless the other side cheats. (Remind you of someone?)
Want to understand the world a little better? Subscribe to GZERO Daily by Ian Bremmer for free and get new posts delivered to your inbox every week.
In reality, Bolsonaro is increasingly likely to lose, and he knows it. He’s not blind to his sliding poll numbers and less-than-solid fundamentals (namely, COVID-19 and the economy). Further, he doesn’t have the backing of a strong political party, and can only watch idly as business leaders who had previously supported his agenda abandon him in droves, alienated by his rhetoric. The Supreme Court and legislators from even his own coalition have checked his most extreme moves.
That is precisely why he’s choosing to campaign not against Lula, who remains broadly popular, but against the Supreme Court, legislatures, and other members of the “deep state.” He can claim that the only world in which he loses the election is a world where all the institutions are stacked against him. Yesterday’s demonstrations served three purposes for Brazil's president:
- To test the effectiveness of his anti-establishment messaging in the run-up to the campaign.
- To make a show of force to intimidate independent institutions, especially the Supreme Court.
- To further delegitimize the Supreme Court and other independent institutions in the eyes of his base, paving the way for an outright refusal to accept a negative electoral outcome.
Goal #1 was a success as measured by the high turnout mobilized, but the win could prove short-lived if a significant number of centrist and pragmatic voters are put off by Bolsonaro’s inflammatory tone. Goal #2 will almost surely fail, given Brazil’s robust institutional design. It is goal #3 that poses the most serious risks. If Bolsonaro’s supporters believe that the election will be rigged against the duly elected president by the powers that be, many will also believe that violence is justified as a means to protecting democracy. In their minds, that’s patriotism, not insurrection. (Sound familiar?)
How likely is Bolsonaro to succeed?
Just as Trump never posed an existential threat to US democracy, Bolsonaro’s ability to actually rig the election is limited.
As in the US, the Brazilian judiciary and electoral court are politically independent (even if they do have a history of overreach). Unlike in the US where elections are overseen by states, Brazilian elections are federal, making them harder to subvert. Also unlike the US, Brazil has a multi-party system where congressional majorities are hard to build. Last but not least, given Brazil’s history with military dictatorship (the last one ended in 1985), military leaders are unlikely to support a coup—even if the next president would be a committed leftist who they dislike and mistrust. Without the military, the courts, or the legislature on his side, Bolsonaro has no chance of overturning an electoral loss.
Having said that, this doesn’t mean his efforts will go without consequences.
A former military man himself, Bolsonaro has overwhelming support among rank-and-file soldiers and state military police. The potential for these heavily armed supporters to cause extended violence is much greater than it ever was in the US, where the vast majority of military and law enforcement defended the rule of law. This risk alone could make January 6 look like a peaceful protest in comparison.
But that’s not the most important danger. Like the US, Brazil has a highly polarized electorate. This means not only that Bolsonaro has a fairly high floor of unconditional support, but also that a large minority of Brazilians believes whatever set of “facts” he peddles. Already, 34% of all Brazilians say that their country’s electoral system has low to zero credibility. By throwing the electoral system into question and amplifying distrust in democratic institutions, Bolsonaro is delegitimizing Brazilian democracy itself. Trust in state and non-state institutions like Congress, the Supreme Court, and the media will be eroded further. No less than 30% of Brazil’s population will be poised to believe the election was stolen. The electorate will become even more divided and dug in than before. Political violence will become more common. Future administrations will have a harder time governing.
The bottom line
There will be a successful presidential transition in Brazil—even if not a peaceful one. Democracy will live to see another day. However, trust in institutions will be eroded and polarization will intensify. The social fabric will be weakened. South America’s largest democracy, the world’s fourth largest, will become more vulnerable.
🔔 And if you haven't already, don't forget to subscribe to my free newsletter, GZERO Daily by Ian Bremmer, to get new posts delivered to your inbox.