What We're Watching: A Polish rainbow, Macron in Lebanon, Bolsonaro must protect indigenous communities

A Polish rainbow: When Poland's ultra-conservative president Andrzej Duda was sworn in for his second term on Thursday, he was greeted by a show of colors, as members of the opposition coordinated their outfits to reflect the rainbow flag that symbolizes solidarity with the gay community. Duda, an ally of the nationalist ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, who beat Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski by a hair, made gay rights a major political issue in the campaign, repeatedly denouncing "LGBT ideology," as a threat to the nation. Meanwhile, several rural Polish towns that support PiS have declared themselves "LGBT free," prompting infuriated officials in Brussels to threaten to withhold EU funding. Indeed, this episode is just the latest flashpoint in the worst culture war in Poland since the end of the Cold War.

Macron's pledge to Lebanon: When French President Emmanuel Macron visited Beirut's shattered downtown on Thursday, he was swarmed by disillusioned Lebanese who had a clear message: "the people demand the fall of the regime." Visiting the former French colony, Macron met with Lebanese political forces from different factions, whose corruption, negligence, and mismanagement are to blame for Tuesday's explosions as well as the country's spiraling economic crisis. Speaking to Lebanese who swarmed the French delegation downtown — many of whom begged the French president to "please help us" — Macron pledged to create "a new political pact in Lebanon," and said he would return to the crisis-ridden country in September to follow up on its progress. Macron also vowed that the current flow of international aid will not be used to line corrupt politicians' pockets but will be directed towards rebuilding the battered capital. Will Macron succeed where successive internal and external efforts have repeatedly failed?

Brazil must protect Amazon tribes from pandemic: Whether he likes it or not — and evidently he does not — Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro must take measures to protect his country's sizable indigenous population from the ravages of the coronavirus. The Supreme Court said as much in a ruling handed down on Wednesday, just hours after a well-known indigenous leader died of the disease. Last month, Bolsonaro — who has questioned the pandemic's severity and wants to see more development of the Amazon rainforest where many indigenous communities live— vetoed parts of a bill containing measures to protect those groups from the spread of COVID-19, citing budgetary concerns. The Supreme Court ruling is likely to inflame ongoing tensions between Bolsonaro (and his followers) and the courts.

More from GZERO Media

Workers are seen outside of the Independent Electoral Commission, where votes will be tallied, on the day before the election, in Gaborone, Botswana October 29, 2024.
REUTERS/Thalefang Charles

The party that has governed Botswana since independence is facing an unexpectedly stiff challenge, as the diamond-rich African nation of 2.5 million heads to the polls against a backdrop of unprecedented economic challenges.

Palestinian baby Reem Abu Hayya, 8 months old, is being cared for by her grandmother in the family home in the town of Abasan al-Kabira, east of Khan Yunis Palestinian baby Reem Abu Hayya, 8 months old, is being cared for by her grandmother in the family home in the town of Abasan al-Kabira, east of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, on October 29, 2024.
IMAGO/APAimages via Reuters Connect
- YouTube

With the US election a week away, why do Israelis prefer a Trump presidency? How might the results of the Georgia elections and subsequent protests affect political stability and EU membership prospects? To what extent will Puerto Rico and Latino voters sway the election in Kamala Harris's favor? Ian Bremmer shares his insights on global politics this week on World In :60.

Activists carry caricatures of Supreme Court justices Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene peaks with people outside of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 1st, as the justices began hearing oral arguments in a case that challenges abortion rights in the United States.
(Photo by Zach Brien/NurPhoto)

Everyone knows there is a lot at stake in next week’s election, with voters deciding between two candidates with vastly different visions for the United States.